Why is it more democratic than the UK?But it's more democractic than the UK so why remain the UK?
Why is it more democratic than the UK?But it's more democractic than the UK so why remain the UK?
They made a judgement with only proven lies being fed to them by the leave campaign. That is not sensible by a minority of the electorate.Sensible people just made a judgement on what was important to them and not on what somebody said would happen.
People with awareness knew what the long term goal was.The 75 referendum was about nothing more than remaining part of the common market, it was **** all to do with a United States of Europe.
You're a total and complete ****ing hypocrite
I disagree - I honestly belief he did what he thought was right, while he has reservations about the EU's swing towards neo-liberal policies he believes we are still better and safer within it and can campaign, change and improve it from within. He believes our workers rights, our human rights and our environment can be better protected with the EU's Social Charter than it can by Theresa May's Bill of Rights and that there is great appetite to change the neo-liberal focus of the EU and we can do this from the inside - it is dangerous to leave ourselves at the mercy of this government's neo-liberal on steroids policies with no protection and no guarantee of on election for 4 years.
But he did campaign and a high number of Labour supporters wanted to Remain and did vote to Remain - trying to convince them to vote Out, especially when he knew that the poorest areas - the ones he's trying hardest to protect, so relied on EU funds, would have been political suicide.
What lies?They made a judgement with only proven lies being fed to them by the leave campaign. That is not sensible by a minority of those who voted
Of course MPs should help their constituents but I take issue with the statement that it is everything an MP should be.I didn'thear those arguments enough from him. Even if you're right, the fact he didn't make as passionate a plea for it (and we know he is a passionate bloke about many things) showed a lack of leadership. It came across as he was happy to play politics with an important issue. He either A) saw the "blue on blue" fighting and stood back to try and take advantage, or B) wanted to try and placate his shadow cabinet who were pro-EU even though he was lukewarm towards it. The fact that I (and may other labour voters) feel like this is why I've lost faith in him.
I'd rather we had David Milliband right now. The trouble is, we have so few MPs that the pool to choose from is pretty ****e.
Can I just add, I have a great deal of respect for John McDonnell. He helped my parents personally as their MP many years ago and the way he did demonstrated EVERYTHING an MP should be.
I am more into the voting route. Do you think that, if a decision is taken by democratic means, if you disagree with it you should then try to get it changed by non-democratic means?
I don't understand why Corbyn should have a strong view on the EU. The two campaigns were non-party. If remaining in or leaving the EU wasn't important to him he is perfectly within his rights to sit it out.I didn'thear those arguments enough from him. Even if you're right, the fact he didn't make as passionate a plea for it (and we know he is a passionate bloke about many things) showed a lack of leadership. It came across as he was happy to play politics with an important issue. He either A) saw the "blue on blue" fighting and stood back to try and take advantage, or B) wanted to try and placate his shadow cabinet who were pro-EU even though he was lukewarm towards it. The fact that I (and may other labour voters) feel like this is why I've lost faith in him.
I'd rather we had David Milliband right now. The trouble is, we have so few MPs that the pool to choose from is pretty ****e.
Can I just add, I have a great deal of respect for John McDonnell. He helped my parents personally as their MP many years ago and the way he did demonstrated EVERYTHING an MP should be.
£350 million sent to the EU every week that they could spend on the NHS is an obvious one as leave have admitted that it was wrong. Undemocratic EU. Others have already been pointed out so you will have seen them if have followed the thread.What lies?
Maybe it is one of tone - you say "heckled" - I see that as just ranting loudly and wanting your voice heard more than other people in the room. If you are at a meeting of your MP with members of the public I don't see anything wrong with respectfully expressing your views.No not at all. But I think you should take action. Back in the 70's you had politicians turning up to church halls and being heckled by the public. Now they're so far removed, the public voice means **** all. I look at the Iraq war, that was democracy in nothing but name. A load of lies and cajolling used to get a vote through in parliament. Democracy my arse! So people took to the streets and were still ignored.
Of course MPs should help their constituents but I take issue with the statement that it is everything an MP should be.
I should have added I agree with your last sentence. Unless he steps down the attacks will definitely continue.
I didn'thear those arguments enough from him. Even if you're right, the fact he didn't make as passionate a plea for it (and we know he is a passionate bloke about many things) showed a lack of leadership. It came across as he was happy to play politics with an important issue. He either A) saw the "blue on blue" fighting and stood back to try and take advantage, or B) wanted to try and placate his shadow cabinet who were pro-EU even though he was lukewarm towards it. The fact that I (and may other labour voters) feel like this is why I've lost faith in him.
I'd rather we had David Milliband right now. The trouble is, we have so few MPs that the pool to choose from is pretty ****e.
Can I just add, I have a great deal of respect for John McDonnell. He helped my parents personally as their MP many years ago and the way he did demonstrated EVERYTHING an MP should be.
I've already admitted that the Leave campaign shouldn't have said that. They have no authority. I think sensible people would realise that. If somebody came to you and said they wanted you to vote for them so the government would spend £350m a week on the NHS, wouldn't you question how they could achieve that if it's not government policy? I think most sensible people would think that there would be £350m a week to spend on what the government of the day decided.£350 million sent to the EU every week that they could spend on the NHS is an obvious one as leave haveadmitted it wrong. Undemocratic EU. Others have already been pointed out so you will have seen them if have followed the thread.
Sorry of this is a daft question, but why are so many MP's supporting Blair?
They can't influence the judgement, so they seemingly presume he's going to be found guilty and want to minimise the punishment, so it can't be on moral grounds. They're ripping the party to shreds, so it can't altogether be on policy, so are they fearful of being caught in any fall out?
I'm sure he did but MPs should play a role in national politics even if it's only by voting.Depends what you class as help. Perhaps the use of the word everything was a bit much, but it meant everything to my parents at the time. He went above and beyond what he could have got away with doing tbf.
Maybe it is one of tone - you say "heckled" - I see that as just ranting loudly and wanting your voice heard more than other people in the room. If you are at a meeting of your MP with members of the public I don't see anything wrong with respectfully expressing your views.
Thanks again. I'm learning a lot from your replies and it's appreciated.
I have a bias, in that I want to see Blair held to account, so would favour option one for that alone, if it reigns in Campbell at the same time, that's a bonus. I'm possibly being greedy, but is their any chance you could make the scenario create misery for Dianne Abbot too?

That doesn't answer the question. £350 million is not sent to the EU every week so that is a lie. Is that hard to understand?I've already admitted that the Leave campaign shouldn't have said that. They have no authority. I think sensible people would realise that. If somebody came to you and said they wanted you to vote for them so the government would spend £350m a week on the NHS, wouldn't you question how they could achieve that if it's not government policy? I think most sensible people would think that there would be £350m a week to spend on what the government of the day decided.
I think a lot of people still remember Blair got power for the Labour Party even if a lot of the grass roots hated him.I can't understand why so many are supporting him, particularly not Tom Watson and Angela Eagle who were both so glowing about Corbyn only last year. But Blair is definitely part of the establishment and the establishment definitely want to stop Corbyn restore the neo-liberal journey the countries been on for the last 35 years and more than likely bury the Chilcott report as it'll embarrass lots of people and make other wars harder to start.
As you say though win or lose it's political suicide for these MPs