Bruce to England?
- Thread starter SydneyTiger14
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Especially the defending a lead mentality. The more I heard the fall out yesterday, the more I though I was listening to someone describing our way of play.
You're the one that came in here to start an argument.
You must log in or register to see media
Now I want Steve Bruce out, I have for a long time but I will say this ref the England job. I actually think he wouldn't be that bad, think about it, every time it's gone pete tong for him it's been because of his crap transfer decisions and his inability to make different cultural players play as a team. What I will say for a positive on him which will suit England is he is a good man manager who knows how to get a team up for a game when it's needed. And that's really what England need. I wouldn't be particularly for him getting the job but I would prefer him to some of the others in the running
yeah they are both rubbish and we shouldn't ever think they are any good and a player who hasn't started a match all season for Arsenal is a far better and does nothing but fall on his arse in an England shirt, you must be right.
Last edited:
'Every time it's gone Pete Tong for him......' One automatic promotion to the Premier League and the clubs highest ever league position, another one via the Championship Play Off Final at Wembley. The clubs first ever FA Cup Final appearance, longest run in the League Cup.............where did it all go wrong eh ?
Come on tubby Thudd wasnt a regular in a championship team.
Ok let's say we put Thudd and Jake on the transfer list and Arsenal put jack on the list
Which player would the top teams try and sign and which ones prob wouldn't even leave their current club? Bearing in mind 2 of them could have left last summer when their team were relegated.
wilshere didn't play much which was due to injury and look who else plays in his position at Arsenal meanwhile at city Thudd and jake are battling for a midfield position with David Meyler.....it hardly seems a fair comparison tubby
Last edited:
You've changed your argument tubby but it's not a problem, I never said they were rubbish , they just aren't as good as wilshere although Tom is nearly as big as Wiltshire though
Who said they both could have left last summer when City were relegated ? Inside information eh or are you just making it up ?
If Wiltshire was as good as you claim he would have been a regular starter in a very average Arsenal team all season, but he wasn't. If he has carried an injury all season and his time on the pitch has been restricted because of it WTF was he doing in the squad in the first place ?
My point about Hudds and Livermore is they both could not have played any worse and both certainly would have put a lot more effort if given the chance to wear an England shirt in the Euro's then Hodgson's gang of posers and no hopers.
I think you dismissing them as though they are not fit to lace Wiltshire's ( the Arsenal bloke) boots and not been good enough to attract another club when City were relegated last season says they were rubbish in your opinion. Me ? I don't rubbish our own players, simple as.
They all had release clauses, that's not inside info or me making it up as far as I'm aware it's a fact
Perhaps they wanted to play for Hull City ? Perhaps no club came forward with a better offer ? and both of them had a far better season then Wiltshire.
And that's y we've only just given one of these players you think is better than jack a new contract