A different direction?
Does everyone remember a few weeks back that either Guan or KBSS from TSW apparently said that we were going in a new direction (or something similar) this summer? I was just having a think to myself catching up over the weekends posts about what this could now possibly mean?
From what I can see so far (and please do not read this as an attack on Kat/Les/The Board), this summer seems VERY similar to many recent summers. E.g. We sell 3-5 of our 'best' assets (I put best in inverted commas as they're actually a mix of those most likely to be overpriced by suitors and/or in some cases aging players likely to see a reduction in playing time - Pelle), we then reinvest on hidden gems for a net transfer surplus, but the surplus some covers additional costs elsewhere (Leibherr loans, staplewood, additional wages), and the end product on the field is of a similar but slightly better quality iteration than the previous.
While I'm perfectly happy with all of the above (assuming we don't have a shocker in the reinvestment part of that process), I'm struggling to see what's different this summer. Is it:
a) We're actually going to surprise everyone and have either a big signing, or a net transfer deficit?
b) That we're going to sign players such that we field a team with more of a specific trait (e.g. British/French/Youth)?
c) We originally planned to go in a different direction, but something in the manager hunt and/or our estimates over how many players wanting out has changed, meaning we've aborted the 'different/new' part?
d) Something else?
What's everyone's thoughts now?
Does everyone remember a few weeks back that either Guan or KBSS from TSW apparently said that we were going in a new direction (or something similar) this summer? I was just having a think to myself catching up over the weekends posts about what this could now possibly mean?
From what I can see so far (and please do not read this as an attack on Kat/Les/The Board), this summer seems VERY similar to many recent summers. E.g. We sell 3-5 of our 'best' assets (I put best in inverted commas as they're actually a mix of those most likely to be overpriced by suitors and/or in some cases aging players likely to see a reduction in playing time - Pelle), we then reinvest on hidden gems for a net transfer surplus, but the surplus some covers additional costs elsewhere (Leibherr loans, staplewood, additional wages), and the end product on the field is of a similar but slightly better quality iteration than the previous.
While I'm perfectly happy with all of the above (assuming we don't have a shocker in the reinvestment part of that process), I'm struggling to see what's different this summer. Is it:
a) We're actually going to surprise everyone and have either a big signing, or a net transfer deficit?
b) That we're going to sign players such that we field a team with more of a specific trait (e.g. British/French/Youth)?
c) We originally planned to go in a different direction, but something in the manager hunt and/or our estimates over how many players wanting out has changed, meaning we've aborted the 'different/new' part?
d) Something else?
What's everyone's thoughts now?