Odd reasoning to give.
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/spor...ton-working-through-paperwork-ronald-11468444
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/spor...ton-working-through-paperwork-ronald-11468444
Slow lawyers - or the numbers involved were so attractive that some of the paperwork got stuck together (who knows what turns accountants on)
But honestly, the personal wages Koeman is getting aren't really that big a deal for a PL club. It seems as though Koeman might be making as little as 5m a year at Everton. We were supposedly already paying him 3.5m. So the difference is 30k a week, which is not an unreasonable raise.
Surely all details could have been sorted by his agent and a few phone calls....I would have thought it was just about getting RK's moniker on a contract.
Exactly..there is what we can afford and what we consider fair remuneration. And what we will never know is what the difference was between what we could pay and what Ron would accept.I thought Everton were going to make RK the 6th highest paid manager in the world or something crazy like that. He is not at that level and we would have been crazy to match that offer.
Even a person dissing Ron to an ex-neighbour in a coffee bar said that it was more about the transfer budget than about RK's wages. I know that somewhere it will be said (when eventually he signs for Everton) that it was down to ambition. This can't always be equated to money...Everton have more disposable income than we do...perhaps Saints could find more, but we are a soundly run ship and we may not feel we need many more players (even Ron said that).

When the vast majority of your supporters earn less than that raise a year, then I would suggest it's a large difference.
Koeman wanted more money than originally agreed. That is the definition of greed.
Therefore he remains a greedy bastard
Surely all details could have been sorted by his agent and a few phone calls....I would have thought it was just about getting RK's moniker on a contract.
And you know this because...
I'm not convinced this was about money personally for RK, and I don't think to him £30k is a lot to him, so is relative to the situation.
I'm fairly sure RK has been successful in business outside of football.
I never got the whole calling him a greedy bastard thing, thought that was down right rude and ill informed...
And you know this because...
I'm not convinced this was about money personally for RK, and I don't think to him £30k is a lot to him, so is relative to the situation.
I'm fairly sure RK has been successful in business outside of football.
I never got the whole calling him a greedy bastard thing, thought that was down right rude and ill informed...
Don't you mean 24 hour series?I have heard Kiefer Sutherland is interested in reading the script of the Koeman affair. Reckons he can string a 24 week series out of the event.
jHow much money is enough, seriously? And in what sort of world does 30k a week become a paltry sum? That's where the "greedy bastard" accusations come from. From the absolute unreality of the figures getting bandied about. It's all a matter of perception I suppose.
My point exactly - a very long 24 hours.Don't you mean 24 hour series?
