Never saw the trust post r/e wembley
But i am up for ANY protest at any away game including wembley if we get there.
But i am up for ANY protest at any away game including wembley if we get there.
From what I've gathered, the Allam's are totally NON-NEGOTIABLE on any decisions they make.
Can anyone give me an example where, at any time, with Hull City or their Business, they have said "Oh, sorry, we'll scrap that and do it your way"!
I don't think so.
I'm not sure you can separate the two, the opposition to the scheme as it stands is based on all its aspects, both pricing and seat moves. The proposals that the Trust put forward as alternatives all involved the reintroduction of concessions and people staying where they were.
Potentially closing the Upper West is the single most stupid aspect of the whole thing for me.
We put a poll on Twitter and Facebook. It was nothing serious though. Just a quick opinion gager to see if it was worth doing again or if people were unlikely to join in.
Could we also do polls on here at the same time as facebook, twitter etc.?
First we need a poll as to whether we should do polls.
Could we also do polls on here at the same time as facebook, twitter etc.?
To me its no concessions for kids and pensioners thats the worst thing
If people are priced out its impossible for them to go as they dont have the money
If people have to move seat its still possible for them to go even if they hate the idea
The removal of concessions is the most damaging, I just think the closing of any stand is the most stupid.
Closing any stand, rather than pricing the seats to fill it, is moronic, before you even get started on the failings of the rest of the scheme.
The removal of concessions is the most damaging, I just think the closing of any stand is the most stupid.
Closing any stand, rather than pricing the seats to fill it, is moronic, before you even get started on the failings of the rest of the scheme.
Speaking from personal experience Mooney does the absolute best he can. He was absolutely brilliant for me when I went over and did everything he could to make it a great trip, above and beyond any supposed professional duty.I think you will recall that I was saying exactly this about 3 years ago. In particular I openly criticized James Mooney, who, as far as I am aware, is the senior manager responsible for all marketing (and communication?) activity at the club - I am happy to retract this if he isn't.
Granted, in the early days, it might of appeared (to some) that he did not embrace the clubs strategy, but was trying to tease it into something more socially acceptable; in other words, he was working around his employers to appease the supporters he met.
Others, such as me (there certainly weren't many of us), thought he was simply playing with folk who trusted him, giving them a glimmer of hope when he knew very well that there was none.
I think I was right, I think I'm still right; nice guy or not, Mooney is the employee he is and just maybe more than that.
Well, that ship sailed a long time ago. The marketing and communication strategy, tone and delivery of the club is so very, very poor that I find it very difficult to believe that an industry professional, with an ounce of thought for future credibility, would stay with it - unless of course, he entirely believes and agrees with it, or is already too tainted to move elsewhere.
Speaking from personal experience Mooney does the absolute best he can. He was absolutely brilliant for me when I went over and did everything he could to make it a great trip, above and beyond any supposed professional duty.
As for why he's still there, I'm not sure myself, I can't imagine working for the club at the moment would be a joyful experience.
True. If people had seen the obvious **** up of the last evictions instead of supporting them, we'd perhaps have a better atmosphere and less fans having walked away which would negate a few of the arguments offered for this one.
I think everyone on the board has heard this now, you really don't need to repeat it daily.
An over exaggeration to say it's mentioned daily, and I can see why you'd prefer the whole **** up to be swept under the carpet, but I don't think it can be mentioned often enough, so that there's less chance similar **** ups in the future. After all, that **** up has contributed to the situation we're in, and in so many ways.
The issues and outcomes were obvious at the time, but some couldn't see it. I've yet to see anyone accept they ****ed up, and show how it can be learned from.
P'S, you don't speak for everyone on this board.
I don't accept some of your assertions on this topic, but I have absolutely no desire to debate them again.
I never claimed to be speaking for anyone other than myself.
I know of several situations where they have had their minds changed.
Pitchfork waving makes us feel better, and has a part to play, but it will most like make them dig their heels in.
The key is to get them believing it's their idea. way of doing that is to get the money seats involved.
Can you be more specific about their changes of mind?