Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The RDBD said:
March it 10 yds or until the line of the opposition box is reached (whichever is nearer) .
Also ask the fouled team whether they want to march the ball forward or not.
Click to expand...

They should have a choice between marching the ball forwards 10 yards or the wall backwards 5 yards. That'll make things interesting.
 
Or allow repositioning of the ball anywhere within a 5 yard radius of where it was originally placed, as long as the ball doesn't go into the box.
 
AKCJ said:
Clatterberg is comfortably the best referee, which sums it up.
Click to expand...
He's absolutely awful. He's probably the only ref that I have genuine questions about the honesty of, too.

The only game that I'm confident in calling fixed in recent years was Lyon's 2011 victory over Zagreb.
The French side needed a massive swing in goal difference to get through their Champions League group.
Ajax had to lose to Real and there had to be a 7 goal switch or they'd go out.
The Dutch had two goals chalked off as they lost 3-0, while the Croats collapsed completely in the second half and lost 7-1.
It was 1-1 at half-time and they conceded 6 goals in 27 minutes, with one defender clearly winking to an opposition player after one goal.
You must log in or register to see images


Some of the defending was absolutely comical and it looked as bent as ****, frankly.
Who was the ref that day? Mark Clattenburg. Did he have anything to do with it? No idea, but it's not a good association to have.
Add that to his financial problems, attempt to join an agency that represents players and general ****eness and I'd rather not have him, ta.
 
Perhaps it would be better if the team awarded a free kick should also be allowed to take the ball back if they feel it gives them more chance of getting the ball over the wall and down again into the net. Not a lot of players can do that from just outside the penalty area
 
Citizen Kane said:
They should have a choice between marching the ball forwards 10 yards or the wall backwards 5 yards. That'll make things interesting.
Click to expand...

The intent must be to have a potential material cost (concede a goal) due to the dissent,
so the message gets through. In rugby, the 10m advance makes a penalty kick or a
kick to line-out near the goal line possible. So you need the equivalent for football.
 
Burnley minutes away from automatic promotion. Makes the Boro v Brighton game even bigger than it already was.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
He's absolutely awful. He's probably the only ref that I have genuine questions about the honesty of, too.

The only game that I'm confident in calling fixed in recent years was Lyon's 2011 victory over Zagreb.
The French side needed a massive swing in goal difference to get through their Champions League group.
Ajax had to lose to Real and there had to be a 7 goal switch or they'd go out.
The Dutch had two goals chalked off as they lost 3-0, while the Croats collapsed completely in the second half and lost 7-1.
It was 1-1 at half-time and they conceded 6 goals in 27 minutes, with one defender clearly winking to an opposition player after one goal.
You must log in or register to see images


Some of the defending was absolutely comical and it looked as bent as ****, frankly.
Who was the ref that day? Mark Clattenburg. Did he have anything to do with it? No idea, but it's not a good association to have.
Add that to his financial problems, attempt to join an agency that represents players and general ****eness and I'd rather not have him, ta.
Click to expand...

I remember watching that game in utter disbelief, it was clearly fixed.


I personally really do rate Clattenberg and it's mainly because he takes each decision as it comes and isn't swayed by the crowd or the occasion.

He gets a lot wrong, but they all do and that won't change until they're given more help. But he referees without an ego and I respect that. Moss, Dean and Dowd are all absolutely poor. Shame that only one of them has retired.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back