Do you mean it is just? Or did you omit to add the question mark?
It's Friday afternoon, I don't bother with question marks when it's almost the weekend.
Do you mean it is just? Or did you omit to add the question mark?
Quite a few of those points and a couple of others were pointed out on here within a very short time of the thing being made public.
Remarkably, some seemed to think "ah, but they wouldn't do that".
There is still the issue of the cost of membership. The club have said it's free if you sign up early, without being clear about what happens if you don't. They've been taken to task for that sort of thing before.
It's hard to believe anyone would sign up if they understand the points raised by the HCST.
It's more than hard to believe, it's clearly bollocks.It's hard to believe anyone would sign up if they understand the points raised by the HCST.
It's Friday afternoon, I don't bother with question marks when it's almost the weekend.

I smell of RatLike commas and apostrophes the presence or absence of a question mark can alter the meaning of a sentence.
Don't go drawing up any contracts on a Friday afternoon.![]()
Very true. Geoff is doing a grand job in getting the message out there, but sadly, some people will only believe what they want to believe, and can find ways of justifying their choice.
Others are signing as a form of continued protection, as for example, a "culled" membership scheme could produce some interesting votes of support.
Brilliant.It's hard to believe anyone would sign up if they understand the points raised by the HCST.
I'm guessing quite a few can't see past the reduction in price?
Some, like myself, are still continuing to buy tickets and attend games.
I can't stand the Allams (or Bruce for that matter) but I won't be forced out of supporting the team.
What a terrific sense of humour you have, Walter. 


Nice one.What a terrific sense of humour you have, Walter.
![]()
I do know a couple of lads like that, but I don't think it's my place to try and influence them.I'm guessing quite a few can't see past the reduction in price?
It is, but it was obvious from the start (maybe not posted, I don't know)I must have missed those post earlier.
They're as good as saying, we are going to trade your details for profit. I've never trusted DDs - that's why I've always paid cash up front. But the hidden admin charges and the ability to change prices is very concerning.
It is, but it was obvious from the start (maybe not posted, I don't know)
The price change option was effectively the flip side of the fact that there is the potential of everyone cancelling the direct debits as s protest
The first time they talked about 5 quid tickets, gift to the community, football should be free, like air...it was so disgustingly obvious they were only in it for profit. Thank goodness they never managed to con HCC into "gifting" them the stadium - it would have been far worse. The problem is that the mistakes they have made in this whole endeavor of theirs is that the degree of shafting of supporters is much more damaging to supporters and the club in general.It is, but it was obvious from the start (maybe not posted, I don't know)
The price change option was effectively the flip side of the fact that there is the potential of everyone cancelling the direct debits as s protest
Yeah. Can you imagine the position we'd be in if they owned the stadium ?!The first time they talked about 5 quid tickets, gift to the community, football should be free, like air...it was so disgustingly obvious they were only in it for profit. Thank goodness they never managed to con HCC into "gifting" them the stadium - it would have been far worse. The problem is that the mistakes they have made in this whole endeavor of theirs is that the degree of shafting of supporters is much more damaging to supporters and the club in general.
Odious snake-oil salesmen is all I can say.
Yeah. Can you imagine the position we'd be in if they owned the stadium ?!
We'll never knowIt's very debatable, but in some suggested outcomes, we could have been better off if they'd got it, as it's suggested they had a buyer set up for a quick sale dependent on getting the stadium and land.
All hypothetical as there's no guarantee the buyer existed, or that they'd have sold, or that the buyer wouldn't have been as bad or worse.
We'll never know
But personally I'm happier that the Council own the ground as despite some criticism of the council it gives an amount of stability