Membership scheme poll

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How does the Membership scheme affect you?

  • I will stay in my current seat and pay more

    Votes: 3 2.7%
  • I will stay in my current seat and pay less

    Votes: 29 26.1%
  • I will move from my current seat and pay more

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • I will move from my current seat and pay less

    Votes: 2 1.8%
  • I will not join

    Votes: 45 40.5%
  • My group will stay where they are and pay more

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • My group will stay where they are and pay less

    Votes: 4 3.6%
  • My group will move and pay more

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • My group will move and pay less

    Votes: 4 3.6%
  • My group will not join

    Votes: 22 19.8%

  • Total voters
    111
People who stand to save money and want to continue watching the side shouldn't be slated, particularly since quite a few have expressed support for any sort of protest.


You seem to be trying to create an issue where one doesn't exist. There was a point raised by one poster that was responded to, and it wasn't slating. You seem to be adding an awful lot to it that isn't actually there.

We've enough disharmony without inventing more.
 
You seem to be trying to create an issue where one doesn't exist. There was a point raised by one poster that was responded to, and it wasn't slating. You seem to be adding an awful lot to it that isn't actually there.

We've enough disharmony without inventing more.

Filey seemed to suggesting something but perhaps I read too much into it. Seen a few seemingly suggest those renewing are to be frowned upon and I agree that disharmony is not needed in this issue.
 
Delete my post plt or olm

Didnt mean to derail this thread by saying im proud of those who dont renew...

Thanks
 
The sample size isn't the biggest but wso far there are 2 people who will pay more.

People are whining for the sake of whining, there's ****er all wrong with this ghastly proposition.
 
There's 30% seemingly happy or ok with the scheme. Thats worrying. Can we see who they are?

What's wrong with the scheme? It saves adults money at the expense of no one. No family will pay more.

Adult season tickets for less than £300, everyone would have ****ed themselves into a coma for this scheme if one of the usual darling clubs like man city or leicester ran it.
 
2 of us in E4, we didn't renew our passes this season but have still been to a majority of home matches on a game by game basis, we have mainly avoided cat A and some cat B matches plus we have been to more away matches. We will gain for 2016/17 but then lose out thereafter, not sure at this point whether we will become members or just continue on a casual basis and do even more away games.
 
There is on the PDF of the KC stadium released yesterday. If a 19-22 year has to move he/she will have options to move to 4 different zones.

You must log in or register to see images


If the West Stand Upper closes the choices will be
Move and Pay more (ZONE 4 £135 more and ZONE 3 £69 more)
Move and pay less (ZONE 2 £21 less and ZONE 1 £93 less)
Do not join.

Am I right or wrong? If I am wrong I will adjust the poll.

Over 65's

You must log in or register to see images


Please note these figures are not based on the discounted prices.

Anyone being forced to move is likely to move somewhere that costs the same or less than where they are now, so almost no-one is likely to pick this option, but it really doesn't matter.
 
What's wrong with the scheme? It saves adults money at the expense of no one. No family will pay more.

Adult season tickets for less than £300, everyone would have ****ed themselves into a coma for this scheme if one of the usual darling clubs like man city or leicester ran it.


No family in the family area will pay more next season. There is no guarantee after that. Other families will pay more if they stay in their current seats. So your statement that no family will pay more is incorrect.

Manchester City charge under 16s between £95 and £125 for season tickets in the family stand we will be charging £252.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gtigerbackin hull
Even those that don't move and pay less are liable to be affected, as the people around them that they've shared the experiences with are liable to change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dennisboothstash
If we don't go up which seems the most obvious thought at the moment then upper west closes.
We have two adults,two conessions & a child in upper west, so we have to move.
To stay just off centre of west stand lower would slightly reduce the two adults but significantly increase the two concessions and the child goes up from £60 to £486. Which lunatic came up with that?
We could move to zone 1 squeezed in to corners but why after all the years I have been going should I be moved.
I was under the impression I was a customer, wrong, I am someone the Allams can dispense with.