The Daily Arsenal

Clearly, you don't. Hence the shambles that has been exposed.

 

Still, it's good to see that I haven't wounded you with my estate agent jibe.

By the way, do you drive a leased Porche 911, Stan?

 

Painful over use of the smiley

 

HIAG you've dropped something mate...


I think it's your arse.


Would you like Stan and me to hand it you back?

 

What? You don't believe me, Pixie? That's the bottom fallen out of my world. Oh, well. Time for a wee Scotch, methinks.

 

I think you'll find that that's Stan's arse you're holding, mate.

 

No mate, it's definitely yours.

 

I don't expect you to be phased by being shown up as a bullshitter mate, it's not the first time it's happened on here

 

You need to probe and prod a little further, Tobes. It's definitely Stan's.

 

Schooled by Stan!

He's an estate agent ffs!

 

Go drown your sorrows mate, as you've been tied up and butchered here.

Stan was brutal in his owning of you here. You picked the wrong subject to talk absolute ****ing bollocks about mate, and have paid a heavy price.

Make sure it's a nice single malt love x

 

No, I have no interest in fancy or status cars. I find people who have flash cars are often over compensating for something.

 

Their lack of flash car ?

 

To be fair, there's barely a subject HIAG can talk about without getting schooled.

 

What's bull-****?

That I have formed an SPV with a builder business partner to acquire an off-the-market pub that has planning for a mix of new-build and conversion residential units, that we're getting 65% (of actual market value) to acquire + 100% build funding, and that it has a GDV of a minimum of £1.1m (possibly £1.3 million), and that acquired my knowledge of this deal through my network of banking contacts?

I have more imagination than that, Pixie! If I was going to bull-**** you, I'd tell you that I was part of a multi-billion pound (sterling) consortium that had bought a large chunk of the Docklands for redevelopment. Please, give me some credit, even if it isn't much!

 

Jesus! That would mean that I have a very, very, very tiny penis!

But I don't, so that cannot be true, Stan.

 

The last 4 pages of your frantically googled property development ramblings.

Up until the part where you went all 'Why are you doing this Stan?'

 

"...property development ramblings?"

What? You mean like my idly disclosing the fact that I was in the process of buying a property for redevelopment with a builder business partner, and that I was getting a cracking deal through my networking grapevine?

Those "property development ramblings," you mean?

 

Btw HIAG, you said that you were buying the land for half of its true market value @£300k, and that your funder was going to lend on the basis of the true value.

Your revised down total project value was £1.1m meaning that the true profit on the development (after the £400k build costs) was only £100k and the remainder was the undervalued property you had supposedly acquired.

A sensible person might realise this and re-sell the project for the £600k and take their profit without the the risk of actually building the thing, for a paltry additional £100k (excluding the funding costs for the time taken from start to the final unit being sold)

You're welcome