One Adam Johnson

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
AKCJ said:
No, it just goes to show that sentencing is based on the case in hand.
Click to expand...

I take you point and agree. So seeing as the girl in the Rix case admitted to lying to him about her age and admitted to willingly having sex with him how does he end up in the nick. saying this maybe a 41 year old should of questioned to himself the situation..
 
AKCJ said:
Not every case is the same...
Click to expand...

Adam Johnson kissed the girl and put his hands down her pants - 6 years

Graham Rix had sexual intercourse with the girl twice and sexually assaulted her - 12 months

You're right not every case is the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peter Saxton
Happy Tiger said:
Despite having been on this forum since the beginning, and seeing some right ****ehouse type posts, the ones from Obi in this thread, right back in this thread make me shake my head.
Click to expand...

Hmm, in the same way your posts advocating the juniors price hikes ....
 
Fez said:
Right verdict, harsh sentence, but it's all his, get on with it.
Click to expand...

The sentence is likely to do nothing to deter other people from sexually abusing children, in fact it may well have the opposite effect.
 
Obadiah said:
The sentence is likely to do nothing to deter other people from sexually abusing children, in fact it may well have the opposite effect.
Click to expand...

That's a tad deep, how do you get to it having the opposite effect?
 
Fez said:
Hmm, in the same way your posts advocating the juniors price hikes ....
Click to expand...
Stop been ****.

I said, quite clearly, I liked the concept but would reserve judgement until ALL of the facts are issued.

I never advocated any hikes.

So, an outright lie from you there. Which is not a surprise.
 
Fez said:
That's a tad deep, how do you get to it having the opposite effect?
Click to expand...

Its his first offence. There is no other evidence of child sexual abuse. No child pornography was found on his phone or computer. He gave her the come on, yes, kissed her, put his hand down her pants and then turned down the opportunity to take it further and have sexual intercourse with her. The judge said he'd be 20 minutes to consider the defence's evidence, he took 7, it appears he'd already sentenced him before hearing all the evidence on sentencing.

Even if the court of appeal throws out his appeal against conviction he's likely to get his sentence reduced. The press will then report Johnson's reduction in sentence. It will then appear to the majority of disinterested people that what he did wasn't as serious as it first appeared.

The opposite to what happened with Stuart Hall and Graham Rix when their convictions were reviewed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fez
Happy Tiger said:
Stop been ****.

I said, quite clearly, I liked the concept but would reserve judgement until ALL of the facts are issued.

I never advocated any hikes.

So, an outright lie from you there. Which is not a surprise.
Click to expand...

You say so much,

It was on their website, brochures being printed, what were you waiting for? No one made anything up, you just ignored the facts and the genuine concern.

You used a **** situation to try and be clever, to belittle folk for being pissed with the owners. It's what an Allam Apologist does, don't ya, Snigger. Happy Easter. <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: balkan tiger
Happy Tiger said:
A taster and not complete.

As was pointed out by a few.

And ignored by many.
Click to expand...

A taster - who told you that? I think most folk took it for what it was, their plan for the future. Public outrage caused the act of review, but they wanted that original plan; hence the brochures.

You just keep making it up and defend the indefensible. I think the 'many' you speak of got it bang to rights.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigerscanada, balkan tiger and Obadiah
Adam and Chedwyn are doing their best to prove the stereotype that footballers are just a bit thick. Loads of money but the morals an alley cat would be proud of. They both have daughters don't they? I suspect they wouldn't be too happy in about 13 years time if some wealthy ****wit like them touched up their offspring. Sadly they don't see anything wrong in their behaviour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FILEYseadog
Obadiah said:
Its his first offence. There is no other evidence of child sexual abuse. No child pornography was found on his phone or computer. He gave her the come on, yes, kissed her, put his hand down her pants and then turned down the opportunity to take it further and have sexual intercourse with her. The judge said he'd be 20 minutes to consider the defence's evidence, he took 7, it appears he'd already sentenced him before hearing all the evidence on sentencing.

Even if the court of appeal throws out his appeal against conviction he's likely to get his sentence reduced. The press will then report Johnson's reduction in sentence. It will then appear to the majority of disinterested people that what he did wasn't as serious as it first appeared.

The opposite to what happened with Stuart Hall and Graham Rix when their convictions were reviewed.
Click to expand...

Okay, I see where you're coming from, but not totally agreeing. I just wonder (I don't really, I think it is probably true) if, had he not have been a high-profile footballer, would this have got the public gaze and indignation it has received. Like I said, the verdict is spot on, but the sentence is out of kilter with the reality of life - for me at least.

By the way, it was, I believe, a tad more than just 'a hand down her pants'. As Micky Flanagan says, it is a fading skill. :emoticon-0105-wink:

You must log in or register to see media
 
Fez said:
You say so much,

It was on their website, brochures being printed, what were you waiting for? No one made anything up, you just ignored the facts and the genuine concern.

You used a **** situation to try and be clever, to belittle folk for being pissed with the owners. It's what an Allam Apologist does, don't ya, Snigger. Happy Easter. <ok>
Click to expand...
Your response is the usual ****y bollocks I see.

So I didn't support price hikes for kids? So you were lieing? So no apology from you? Just the usual self justifying endless droning from you?

You're simply an odious old **** who loves the sound of his own voice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back