Pretty sure PNP isn't the one getting confused.
Counter-attacking is different to attacking. To counter attack is to generally allow the opposition control of the game but to thwart their killer instincts with a bid to then gain possession while the opposition has a number of players in your half and then break quickly with the intent on grabbing a goal against the run of play, it's a very effective tactical approach especially when teams - like yourselves with Vardy and Mahrez - have pacey players up top.
To attack is to generally send waves of players forward with the intent of overloading the opposition, keeping possession in the opponents half with the idea of making space/ causing opposition mistakes which then leads to goalscoring chances.
There's no right or wrong way to go about things though, no one is actually criticising your style of play and I don't see why you seem to take offence from PNP when called a counter-attacking side when you yourself have clearly said you are. If you'd read previous posts on our board you'll find most if not all of us have been very complimentary of Leicester for what you've done so far and how you've played. Vardy and Mahrez - Mahrez especially for me, think he's quality - have been really enjoyable to watch from a neutral perspective and I hope you can keep them past the Summer because no doubt someone like Utd or Liverpool will be looking to throw about £20m at one of them.
I don't have a problem with being called a counter attacking side. But to say that it's a defensive way of playing football is ridiculous.
If we are offered 20m for either Mahrez or Vardy then I imagine the bidder will be told to do one.
