It happens I am afraid.
Paul Pogba anyone?
At least I'm comfortable that Pogba didn't move to our biggest rival

It happens I am afraid.
Paul Pogba anyone?

At least I'm comfortable that Pogba didn't move to our biggest rival![]()

Hazard would get into the Villa team with one leg. Being fair though, De Bruyne looked pants when I saw him and I never thought he would hold down a place.
Without doubt, hindsight is a great thing to have.
The point is that every club has sold players that turn out to be better than we thought. Selling to a rival isn't the point.![]()
Wolfsburg are our biggest rival?!At least I'm comfortable that Pogba didn't move to our biggest rival![]()
Was he playing for Chelsea against Bayern? I watched him when he played for us and that is what I meant.De Bruyne didn't have a fair chance at Chelsea. Jose selling him to Wolfsburg was the best thing that happened in his career as he found his confidence again. You have to watch his performance against Bayern last season to prove your 'pants' claim wrong.
Imagine if he was given a proper chance in West London. Ditto Salah.
Hindsight is beautiful, isn't it?

Wolfsburg are our biggest rival?!
News to me!!
Where he moves to after that, we have no hand in at all.
Wolfsburg are our biggest rival?!
News to me!!
Where he moves to after that, we have no hand in at all.
A scarp? Is that a fish?Trying to be clever, aren't you?
Oh well, enjoy watching De Bruyne lifting the Premier League trophy while Chelsea work their way out of a relegation scarp![]()
Not really mate.Trying to be clever, aren't you?
Oh well, enjoy watching De Bruyne lifting the Premier League trophy while Chelsea work their way out of a relegation scarp![]()
Not really mate.
Just wondering what the **** De Bruyne moving to City has to do with Chelsea, like its Chelsea's fault for selling him to a rival.
He was sold abroad, to a German team, we can't help where he moves to after that.
He is a good player, whose price was artificially inflated due to one good season and the fact that the buyers have an insane amount of cash.
No one would have turned down £55m for De Bruyne, because he is replaceable, a good player, but replaceable.
We had a similar situation with Luiz. We were offered silly money for a player that we could easily replace for half the price.

Bod, this guy is a tool. Just sit back and watch his posts.
Not really mate.
Just wondering what the **** De Bruyne moving to City has to do with Chelsea, like its Chelsea's fault for selling him to a rival.
He was sold abroad, to a German team, we can't help where he moves to after that.
He is a good player, whose price was artificially inflated due to one good season and the fact that the buyers have an insane amount of cash.
No one would have turned down £55m for De Bruyne, because he is replaceable, a good player, but replaceable.
We had a similar situation with Luiz. We were offered silly money for a player that we could easily replace for half the price.
If you knew he was worth £55m, why sell him in the first place? Tbh, De Bruyne is a drop off the ocean as part of Chelsea's policy to buy young players cheaply then sell them for a profit.
Problem is, if De Bruyne was given a fair chance at Chelsea and perform like he did for Wolfsburg, is he worth coming to your biggest rival in the Premier league?
If you knew he was worth £55m, why sell him in the first place? Tbh, De Bruyne is a drop off the ocean as part of Chelsea's policy to buy young players cheaply then sell them for a profit.
Problem is, if De Bruyne was given a fair chance at Chelsea and perform like he did for Wolfsburg, is he worth coming to your biggest rival in the Premier league?
At least I don't spin facts like you do. You should get a career in politics.
The difference between us is I can acknowledge the club made a mistake while you keep denying the facts even when the player you originally had is now helping your rivals.
We didn't know De Bruyne was worth £55m, a) Because we never played him and b) Most importantly, he ISNT worth £55m!
He is a very good player, who, when given the chance at Wolfsburg, had a very good season. He was then purchased for insane cash.
We have seen many players who have had a great season, then fail to live up to that in subsequent seasons.
Andy Carroll for instance. Great season for Newcastle, purchased for big bucks by Liverpool, then was "Meh!" for them.
Now I am not saying De Bruyne won't be a good buy for City, just that he was probably worth £25-30m at the VERY MAX, but City paid stupid money. Because thats what teams with more money than sense do, we used to operate in a similar fashion, before Roman became more Austere in his approach.
PSG and Monaco have been operating in silly fashion aswell, paying ridiculous sums for players like Falcao and Luiz.
United too, since SAF has left, has been paying over the odds for players, especially last season when they had no CL football to offer.
Its just how the game is now.
And how were we meant to know that he would be coming to City?
If you kept him and put him in the starting XI as a regular instead of selling him, perhaps he wouldn't.
If you kept him and put him in the starting XI as a regular instead of selling him, perhaps he wouldn't.
