Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I'd say that full back position is important and we need cover. Enrique is practically gone, Randall can't defend, not seen enough of Brad smith. Flanno doesn't have the pace or ability to support the attack.

We need like for like replacements for Moreno and Clyne

May as well so Coutinho, Sakho, Can and Klopp whilst we're at it
 
Or we buy one Fb and don't disregard the only FB we have that's actually been part of a PL title challenge.

Yep, Flanno played a big part in that. His performances were instrumental and without him, we would have struggled.

And the reason I disregard him is because of his style. If we put him in place of clyne or Moreno, we lose that attacking threat. It's not like for like. We need options/back ups who we can slot in without compromising our overall style.

It's similar to when Gomez came in at left back - we lost our attacking threat down the left.
 
Yep, Flanno played a big part in that. His performances were instrumental and without him, we would have struggled.

And the reason I disregard him is because of his style. If we put him in place of clyne or Moreno, we lose that attacking threat. It's not like for like. We need options/back ups who we can slot in without compromising our overall style.

It's similar to when Gomez came in at left back - we lost our attacking threat down the left.

So you think we should have identical players in each position? Great squad options that <doh>

As I've said to you many many times before, you just don't like Flanno. Just say that rather than trying spin some bollox <laugh>
 
Or we can just carry on relying on our two good full backs and pray they don't get injured.

Ideally you should buy the spine and be able to develop good enough players for the wings

If Flanno is ready to cover LB/RB then I don't consider it a priority but would take a good player at the right price
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy Squarefoot
So you think we should have identical players in each position? Great squad options that <doh>

As I've said to you many many times before, you just don't like Flanno. Just say that rather than trying spin some bollox <laugh>

You're right I don't like Flanno. But this is beside the point - as I said, we need options who are able to fill in without us having to compromise our style.

As we've seen, we've become reliant on certain players and if they're injured, we have to change style. It's like using Benteke instead of Sturridge. Or Lovren ahead of Sakho (we struggle to play out from the back).

And certainly in the case of full back, we rely on their pace to get forward and back quickly. It's a big part in how we play. And we only have two full backs at the club who are able do this. Injury to either one of them and we lose a lot.
 
He might need a decent season on loan.

He was at Swindon but barely played... maybe need a year in the Championship like Ibe did with Derby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirtyFrank
Not been overly impressed by Randall so far though. Tadic had him on toast from what I saw and in the last round he wasn't great against Bournemouth either, although did improve in the 2nd half.

Still young though but again, think he could do with a loan. Not really played much first team football so to come right into a team challenging top is tricky.
 
I'd like to see Smith given a couple of chances as sub in games when we are already a few goals up. Did nothing wrong against Saints and delivered a brilliant cross for Origi's goal.
That's what we should do with youngsters anyway and not the stupidity of what Brendan done with him to shatter his confidence. Sorry gerrez lol not Brendan bashing but it was ******ed