Just one more before I quit this easy-fest Mike Hulme - Climate change professor East Anglia (epicentre of climate change along with Potsdam research unit) http://www.mikehulme.org/ Mike wrote a book, here are some quotes. please log in to view this image "because the idea of climate change is so plastic (obviously Global Warming wasn't so they rebranded it) it can be deployed across many of our human projects and can serve many of our psychological, ethical, and spirtual needs" WT actual **** #fraud #political #ideology #pseudoscience
IT TOOK TWO CENTURIES TO BUILD IT. Construction on a campanile, or bell tower to accompany the public cathedral in the Italian riverside city of Pisa broke ground in August 1173. By 1178, workers had made it to the third story of the structure, which was already tilting slightly to the north. Military conflicts with other Italian states would soon halt progress on the tower, which would not resume until 1272. This time, construction only remained underway for 12 years before another war again stopped the work. A final wave of construction picked up again in the early 14th century, concluding with the installation of a bell chamber in 1372.
In Ancient Rome, the punishment for killing one's father was the death penalty, consisting of being sewn up in a sack along with a viper, a dog, and a cock.
Apparently donkey Kong was meant to have been called monkey Kong but there was a mistake in translation.
The Bororo people of Brazil are one of the few groups of people where all have the same blood type: "O".
You guys are funny, IPCC data is apparently not credible when it disagrees with your beliefs. Your surious claims and Milks about global warming were ripped apart and this ^^chart proves it Sadly, you and Milk appealed to authority, "They said it" as your only arguments. Appealing to authority vs actual data. No contest. Data is a bad thing when it doesn't support your arguments apparently That epitomises the climate pseudo science as we know they delete inconvenient data. That is not disputed even The "jokes" and all liking each other's posts, is the stuff of school yard kids. BTW, as stated in "climate science" Net emission of CO2 is proportional to CO2 increase rate. That's the mathematics, which you argued against on the other thread, several of you did without even understanding the core concept. The result of the equation is simple, CO2 rate of increase is direclty linked to CO2 emission from the surface of the earth, so if we produce CO2 at increased rates and CO2 rate of increase does not rise.. that means humans are not causing the increase. But you couldn't even get your head around that simple concept. Your "beliefs" were behind your argument, nothing more. Not even your lame wiki link that was not even related which proved you didn't even understand the debate.
Yes but this is in response to lies and myths being disproven by measurements It's full of win.. I mean lose Had I just said all those things and not posted the actual facts, ye all would have appealed to a higher power "they said" and called me a conspiracy theorist. I prove what I say and ye have a crisis of belief What I find disappointing is not that people get stuff wrong, I do all the time, it's when they think they are right when they don't even know the subject matter. I love it when people talk about Koch and Exxon, it shows how stupid they are
An underground coal fire has been burning in Centralia, Pennsylvania since 1962 please log in to view this image
