Typical loser. I show facts and I am making reasonable arguments and this is the pathetic tosh you come out with. But you "believe" in global warming, stick to football banter. Reason is lost on you
No because I'm on phone at work so can't watch videos. I'll prob with when I get home. Ive seen plenty of theories and a big programme on how they possibly used explosives to 'help' being the building down... However no one has tried to claim that there were no planes flying into the twin towers. Mainly because everyone bloody saw the planes flying into the buildings. So going back to my question, are you trying to suggest that there were no planes flying into the towers?
I'm the only one supporting my argument that's what is hilarious, all ye have is "belief" and absolutely 0 objectivity.
Well if you watched the videos you would know that people on the day that were there say there were no planes, how could I know? I was in ireland at the time watching on Sky news. Of course you do know that the planes supposedly flew near twice their manufacture speed limits? max speed 360 or 380 knotts, planes "recorded speed" over 500 knotts.
Wish I could remember what the programmes were called but there was a show on TV where they got conspiracy theorists together and showed that what they claimed to be impossible was in fact entirely possible. This included proving that there would have been enough heat to melt the metal supports. Of course, these TV producers were probably in on it too like
...and they're all worthless. As anyone who knows my name and roughly where I live can find my address for £3 on the net anyway. The rest would be at best titillation, and of no consequence to my actual life. People obsess about this sort of **** without actually standing back and thinking about the actual reality of it. People who obtained data of this sort illegally would be seeking to use it as some sort of lever to extract cash, my web history has no value in that regard and neither does any other 'normal' persons.
Regarding Pentagon. Again... There would be eye witnesses. Many of whom are tourists and less likely to be bribed "for good of country". The Metro goes above ground quite near to the Pentagon. It is fully visible and a busy train line. The US govt managed to track all those moving targets down to bribe them too?
You showed me a stupid ****ing grainy ass video that shows nothing! Loser? Who are you Donald Trump? "You baby, you Dummy!"
I spent mine on fabricating something called Global warming...I bought off half the worlds scientific minds and fabricated our Earths destruction for money....YES BEAUTIFUL MONEY!!! MWAHAHAHAA
The maximum speed of a Boeing 767 is 530 mph... so that's bollocks for a start off. For every one of those people in that video there's hundreds more who describe seeing the planes hit, but as uusla you only allow to lodge what suits your agenda on the issue. No answer to my question then, re: the video I posted?
No you're posting ridiculous theories and we're explaining why it is a ludicrous proposition. If I told you that London isn't real it was destroyed by space monkey's in 2007 and the British government has recreated a holographic London to make it look like it's still there. You would call me an idiot and not goto Google to research "anglophobic space monkey's" to prove I was wrong.
