Off Topic DISCOVERIES !

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Bodanki said:
Still want to maintain you are not claiming there were no planes during 9/11? <laugh>

Again, one question that debunks the whole thing....."WHY....ADD....PLANES?"
Just say it was a bomb.
You telling me that if the news reported a plane crashed into the pentagon, that not a single person from the probably tens of thousands of people in the vicinity, would speak out and say "erm....I was there....there was no plane, it was just an explosion" a ****ing 747 flying at low heights and smashing into a building isn't something you would miss if you are within a mile radius of the crash. <doh>
Adding planes when there weren't any would be the most ridiculous idea ever.

Conspirator 1: Lets engineer a terrorist attack on US soil so we can attack the middle east
Conspirator 2: Ok cool, what buildings shall we hit?
Conspirator 1: hmmmm. The World Trade Center? AND the Pentagon, lets really amp up the fear factor!
Conspirator 2: Excellent so how we gonna explain how the terrorists planted bombs in these buildings, avoiding all security?
Conspirator 1: We'll say planes hit them!
Conspirator 2: Eh?
Conspirator 1: We'll get some planes to crash into the buildings!
Conspirator 2: What Planes?! Who will fly them?
Conspirator 1: Thats the best part, there won't be any planes, we'll just say there was! haha
Conspirator 2: Erm..How would we pull that off? Surely the whole of New York will say there was no planes
Conspirator 1: Doesn't matter, we'll CGI planes onto some news footage, people will believe anything they see on TV.
Conspirator 2: But what about the million eye ball witnesses, the response teams and people who were in the tower that survived, they would surely rumble us?
Conspirator 1: How about we hijack real planes and crash them then?
Conspirator 2: Why? Then we have to doom more innocent people to die, plus we will have to somehow get the airlines on board....your plan is ******ed! Lets just bomb them for ****s sake!
Conspirator 1: No, It HAS TO BE PLANES DAMN IT!! **** YOU

*Flashback*
Young Conspirator 1: Merry Christmas mummy
Mummy: Merry Christmas Joey! Here's your present
Young Conspirator 1: Gee, thanks mom, Is it the Apache helicopter scale model kit I wanted? It is isn't it?
Mummy: Erm....well you see....
*boy rips open present*
Young Conspirator 1: The **** is this? A Toy 747?
Mummy: They had sold out of Apache's Joey, I did my best.
Young Conspirator 1: You ****ing Whore!! I don't want no planes bitch...I want my Apache!! WWWWAAAAAHHH!


Ok I am very bored.
Click to expand...

Typical loser. I show facts and I am making reasonable arguments and this is the pathetic tosh you come out with. But you "believe" in global warming, stick to football banter. Reason is lost on you <ok>
 
BringBackFootie. said:
How could I know that, I could suspect, did you just watch the CNN interview, it#s only a minute, no plane at the pentagon according to their guest who inspected the site first hand.

So we have a guy who was there on the day on site and seen no trace of any plane at the pentagon.

People think they watched this live, they didn't.

ABC News, no plane at WTC reported. CNN no plane at pentagon, this was the first day. Witness accounts no planes, bombs, firemen "we heard explosions beneath our feet", these are not scared people they are trained professionals after all. Fire Chief on the day "we have bombs in the building".

Eye witness accouts in the media from that day you probably didn;t see ;)
You must log in or register to see media

Firemen, secondary explosion.
You must log in or register to see media

Now I know you wont watch those because you are not actually wanting to know the whole story, just what you want to believe, watch them.

Above is the pentagon no plane report I posted you probably didn't watch either.
Opinions seem to be better than evidence for you guys, not proof, but evidence the official story is bollocks
Click to expand...

No because I'm on phone at work so can't watch videos. I'll prob with when I get home.

Ive seen plenty of theories and a big programme on how they possibly used explosives to 'help' being the building down... However no one has tried to claim that there were no planes flying into the twin towers. Mainly because everyone bloody saw the planes flying into the buildings.

So going back to my question, are you trying to suggest that there were no planes flying into the towers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: saintanton
I'm the only one supporting my argument that's what is hilarious, all ye have is "belief" and absolutely 0 objectivity. :D
 
InKlippertyKloppWeTrust said:
No because I'm on phone at work so can't watch videos. I'll prob with when I get home.

Ive seen plenty of theories and a big programme on how they possibly used explosives to 'help' being the building down... However no one has tried to claim that there were no planes flying into the twin towers. Mainly because everyone bloody saw the planes flying into the buildings.

So going back to my question, are you trying to suggest that there were no planes flying into the towers?
Click to expand...

Well if you watched the videos you would know that people on the day that were there say there were no planes, how could I know? I was in ireland at the time watching on Sky news.

Of course you do know that the planes supposedly flew near twice their manufacture speed limits? max speed 360 or 380 knotts, planes "recorded speed" over 500 knotts.
 
Wish I could remember what the programmes were called but there was a show on TV where they got conspiracy theorists together and showed that what they claimed to be impossible was in fact entirely possible. This included proving that there would have been enough heat to melt the metal supports. Of course, these TV producers were probably in on it too like <laugh>
 
Womble Milk said:
Never illegally downloaded anything. Been to a website the Mrs wouldn't approve? Or the boss? Or a client? Or an emloyee?

Never purchased anything online that you would rather be private? Or researched a symptom or disease that might make people ask questions?

Never got into a fight with someone online who might like to know where you live.

Would you be comfortable with Astro knowing your real name, place of work, and home address? :emoticon-0105-wink:


Anyone who had full access to your data could access any of these things.
Click to expand...

...and they're all worthless.

As anyone who knows my name and roughly where I live can find my address for £3 on the net anyway.

The rest would be at best titillation, and of no consequence to my actual life.

People obsess about this sort of **** without actually standing back and thinking about the actual reality of it.

People who obtained data of this sort illegally would be seeking to use it as some sort of lever to extract cash, my web history has no value in that regard and neither does any other 'normal' persons.
 
BringBackFootie. said:
Well if you watched the videos you would know that people on the day that were there say there were no planes, how could I know? I was in ireland at the time watching on Sky news
Click to expand...

Maybe they only interviewed death and blind people...?
 
BringBackFootie. said:
How could I know that, I could suspect, did you just watch the CNN interview, it#s only a minute, no plane at the pentagon according to their guest who inspected the site first hand.

So we have a guy who was there on the day on site and seen no trace of any plane at the pentagon.

People think they watched this live, they didn't.

ABC News, no plane at WTC reported. CNN no plane at pentagon, this was the first day. Witness accounts no planes, bombs, firemen "we heard explosions beneath our feet", these are not scared people they are trained professionals after all. Fire Chief on the day "we have bombs in the building".

Eye witness accouts in the media from that day you probably didn;t see ;)
You must log in or register to see media

Firemen, secondary explosion.
You must log in or register to see media

Now I know you wont watch those because you are not actually wanting to know the whole story, just what you want to believe, watch them.

Above is the pentagon no plane report I posted you probably didn't watch either.
Opinions seem to be better than evidence for you guys, not proof, but evidence the official story is bollocks
Click to expand...


Regarding Pentagon. Again... There would be eye witnesses. Many of whom are tourists and less likely to be bribed "for good of country".

The Metro goes above ground quite near to the Pentagon. It is fully visible and a busy train line. The US govt managed to track all those moving targets down to bribe them too?
 
BringBackFootie. said:
Typical loser. I show facts and I am making reasonable arguments and this is the pathetic tosh you come out with. But you "believe" in global warming, stick to football banter. Reason is lost on you <ok>
Click to expand...
You showed me a stupid ****ing grainy ass video that shows nothing!
Loser? Who are you Donald Trump?
"You baby, you Dummy!"
 
Womble Milk said:
Regarding Pentagon. Again... There would be eye witnesses. Many of whom are tourists and less likely to be bribed "for good of country".

The Metro goes above ground quite near to the Pentagon. It is fully visible and a busy train line. The US govt managed to track all those moving targets down to bribe them too?
Click to expand...

What did you spend your bribe on...? <whistle>
 
BringBackFootie. said:
Well if you watched the videos you would know that people on the day that were there say there were no planes, how could I know? I was in ireland at the time watching on Sky news.

Of course you do know that the planes supposedly flew near twice their manufacture speed limits? max speed 360 or 380 knotts, planes "recorded speed" over 500 knotts.
Click to expand...

The maximum speed of a Boeing 767 is 530 mph... so that's bollocks for a start off.

For every one of those people in that video there's hundreds more who describe seeing the planes hit, but as uusla you only allow to lodge what suits your agenda on the issue.

No answer to my question then, re: the video I posted?
 
BringBackFootie. said:
I'm the only one supporting my argument that's what is hilarious, all ye have is "belief" and absolutely 0 objectivity. :D
Click to expand...



No you're posting ridiculous theories and we're explaining why it is a ludicrous proposition.


If I told you that London isn't real it was destroyed by space monkey's in 2007 and the British government has recreated a holographic London to make it look like it's still there.

You would call me an idiot and not goto Google to research "anglophobic space monkey's" to prove I was wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes The Grinch
Womble Milk said:
No you're posting ridiculous theories and we're explaining why it is a ludicrous proposition.


If I told you that London isn't real it was destroyed by space monkey's in 2007 and the British government has recreated a holographic London to make it look like it's still there.

You would call me an idiot and not goto Google to research "anglophobic space monkey's" to prove I was wrong.
Click to expand...

You're an idiot :bandit:
 
  • Like
Reactions: In MILK we trust
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back