Match Day Thread Hull City v Leicester City
- Thread starter Chazz Rheinhold
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
As I recall you were the **** telling everyone you had an (imaginary) stream, and everyone could **** off as you weren't sharing the link, and then got all precious when people were asking you to prove said stream.
Stop been dosile ****.
You cannot beat a good loser
You're not wrong.
Good job there haven't been any.
Nor have there been too many bad winners, barring the usual suspects of course
You're not wrong.
Good job there haven't been any.
Nor have there been too many bad winners, barring the usual suspects of course
You're saying none of the Leicester lot are good losers?
It doesn't bother me that we're out as we'll play them anyway but it gives your fans a big day out to look forward to I suppose. Good luck.
I look at the likes for my post and to some extent I think thank you, but I also wonder why. This board lost the plot (for me) when a moderator banned me outside of his usual parameters, simply because I disagreed with him. No way was it worthy; just a question, a difference of opinion and mutual dislike.
That's done and dusted, as far as I am concerned, but our moderators really do need to get a grip. This isn't Twitter (a failing medium), this is about conversation, opinion, point of view - being in-the-know does not make you good or right, being succinct might just indicate you have little to offer. I have, over the years, been told
to use PM, but what a convenient joke that is for our moderators.When you have folk, who dislike each other so much, it is difficult to keep a sensible balance in conversation and moderation.
This isn't Twitter, the Witch-Hunt on Roo was ****, he had a point, just not everyone's.
It's easy to be abusive on here, for some, isn't it?
I look at the likes for my post and to some extent I think thank you, but I also wonder why. This board lost the plot (for me) when a moderator banned me outside of his usual parameters, simply because I disagreed with him. No way was it worthy; just a question, a difference of opinion and mutual dislike.
That's done and dusted, as far as I am concerned, but our moderators really do need to get a grip. This isn't Twitter (a failing medium), this is about conversation, opinion, point of view - being in-the-know does not make you good or right, being succinct might just indicate you have little to offer. I have, over the years, been told
When you have folk, who dislike each other so much, it is difficult to keep a sensible balance in conversation and moderation.
This isn't Twitter, the Witch-Hunt on Roo was ****, he had a point, just not everyone's.
It's easy to be abusive on here, for some, isn't it?
Who banned you?
I look at the likes for my post and to some extent I think thank you, but I also wonder why. This board lost the plot (for me) when a moderator banned me outside of his usual parameters, simply because I disagreed with him. No way was it worthy; just a question, a difference of opinion and mutual dislike.
That's done and dusted, as far as I am concerned, but our moderators really do need to get a grip. This isn't Twitter (a failing medium), this is about conversation, opinion, point of view - being in-the-know does not make you good or right, being succinct might just indicate you have little to offer. I have, over the years, been told
When you have folk, who dislike each other so much, it is difficult to keep a sensible balance in conversation and moderation.
This isn't Twitter, the Witch-Hunt on Roo was ****, he had a point, just not everyone's.
It's easy to be abusive on here, for some, isn't it?
I often wonder why people are happy to spend so long arguing on here over the most stupid of things.
Don't think I've ever involved myself in any argument to the same extent of pages and pages of posts. For example, I don't agree with most of the things the Leicester fans come here and post but I don't waste my time arguing back with them.
You can have a difference of opinion but it's easier and quicker to move on and agree to disagree then 47 pages later still argue over whether ketchup should be eaten on hotdogs or whether it should be mustard.
Decent threads are becoming increasingly derailed. My last thread turned into a religion-fest when some people trying to get it locked.
DMD - as far as I am aware he was the only moderator who thought it justified, he went out of his way to do it, he waxed lyrical in PM (he is careful like that) but he took an individual action that, as far as I am aware, was not the moderator majority view ( an accepted convention), just a personal venting of the spleen. In my view it was an absolute disgrace and it defined him.
I tried to deal with this by PM, as we are told to do, but what a fail that was. You are told to contact a Super -Mod (as you are banned) but you are banned and you can't, no access! You are later (when you are back) told that Super-Mods will not interfere with an individual board - such as ours. No recourse, no honesty, just their own personal bickering - we see this **** every week - but there are rules that flex when needed.
Like some I read these conversations and enjoy them, but I also read double-standards, arrogance and folk who just would not say it to your face.
I think Twitter has bred Twats and that if folk have such an issue with each other that it compromises this board then they should step down and let events move on.
But we don't discuss religion or politics on here, unless a moderator is involved. Not a case of not being on-line, just their personal take on it, as it suits them.