Go back to your class.Suck your Socialist Worker, useful idiot.
Go back to your class.Suck your Socialist Worker, useful idiot.
Typical insular Hull attitude. And typically ignorant of the facts.
Why do you associate yourself with Hull, and then repeatedly try and drag it down with bigoted ****e like that?
Oh dear. We mustn't criticise any utterances by anyone from Hull no matter how parochial, narrow minded and inaccurate they are. In fact his remark was bigoted ****e.
You know i'm right. Just look at the foundations of the sport & the foundations of RL in England. That's before you get to the fans who go to Twickenham- Tarquin, Lawrence, Hugo.
Football is already destroying itself as well. How much was it tday at City? £27 in the second division. Not good is it?
Who said you can't?
I simply asked why you associate with a place and it's people when you seem to loath both so much, so why do you?
I support Hull City for the simple reason it was my nearest football club. Have done for over 50 years through thick and thin.unlike so many Hull born people who deserted them in bad times and chose to associate themselves with clubs from other cities. Pointing out when people from Hull are talking crap doesn't mean you loathe them. Stop being such a thin-skinned drama queen. No doubt you are presently looking for something negative to write about the East Riding and its residents to,show your loathing of them.
You can't whine about someone making a sweeping generalisation and inaccuracies by replying with more and bigger sweeping generalisations and inaccuracies.
I don't loathe the east riding, I love the place and many of its people. If I've criticised it, it tends to be to bighlight the hypocritical bigoted ****e from you and a couple of others like you.
What sweeping generalisations did I make in my reply?
I,would have thought someone wishing for Hull to progress from being a bit of a provincial backwater would be rather dismayed by the insular, small town attitudes of some of its citizens.
'Typical insular Hull attitude. And typically ignorantof the facts.'
Looks pretty sweeping to me.
That wasn't a sweeping generalisation it was, unfortunately, true.
Enjoy your evening in your village.
I would if I lived in a village.
The comparison is with one off events which the papers always criticise football prices for.
Internationals at Twickenham are generally dearer than internationals at Wembley.
It really does seem to bug you that a lot more people are prepared to pay more money to watch RU than RL.
Do you think they will make back the £80million they paid for the rights to stage the tournament plus all the other costs by only selling 25% of the tickets? It isn't like the RL World Cup where they had to give tickets away for most games and even then only got meagre crowds for games not involving England.
The comparison is with one off events which the papers always criticise football prices for.
Well a packed out Villa Park have just seen the Springboks beat Samoa quite convincingly 46-6. Now for the big one England v Wales at Twickers.
**** me, THAT is how a team should sing the anthem.