Transfer Rumours Transfers- Rumours, deals, bollocks...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
See there we turned down loan for Stokes to go Bolton, concern we don't have anyone to bring in there.....although weird seeing Christie doing press conference on his own without manager or representative from club, hopefully they are too busy trying to get a decent striker in
 
Btw Gronigen get £1.5m too, so in effect we sold Virgil for £13m as we would have been liable for the extra but we got Soton to pay it. Great bit of business.
 
Turd Burglar said:
For Peter Lawwell.

The team's ****ter than it was yesterday but at least his bonus will be a cracker this year.
Click to expand...

If I let things like that concern me I'd chuck it. It's a business and Van Dijk was going anyway, either now or for nout in January, I would love Celtic to spend all that money on a striker or more players but its never happened before so I don't expect it to change anytime soon.

I'm gounded in reality.
 
The club can't win with some. Last year it was too many loan signings and not enough money spent.

This window is the biggest spend in years and only one loan deal.

Some ****s are never happy.
 
No point in getting in a striker just for the sake of it, surely we have learned that by now.

Hopefully it will free up a place in the squad for someone to come through.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VenomPD
Thomas The Cat said:
No point in getting in a striker just for the sake of it, surely we have learned that by now.

Hopefully it will free up a place in the squad for someone to come through.
Click to expand...

Reading that Ronny didn't fancy any of the loan strikers we were offered and decided Stokes could do a better job.

Makes you wonder what kind of pish we were legitimately offered on loan <yikes>

Bolton wanted Celtic to pay 80% of Stokes wages if they took him on loan. <laugh>
 
VenomPD said:
Reading that Ronny didn't fancy any of the loan strikers we were offered and decided Stokes could do a better job.

Makes you wonder what kind of pish we were legitimately offered on loan <yikes>

Bolton wanted Celtic to pay 80% of Stokes wages if they took him on loan. <laugh>
Click to expand...

He can't exactly be on a big wage, they must be proper skint.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back