Off Topic NEW GAME SIGNUP

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Less Hope Than Neville said:
Sorry - having conversations with myself again <laugh>

You are not 100% confirmed innocent. If you and Bobby are both bad guys then there is the chance that Bobby is covering you and making up the investigation result. Not saying he is, just realised its a possibility. So 90% innocent....

Why does my mind go into overdrive when everyone else has gone to bed?? <laugh>
Click to expand...

Hopefully Bobby isn't guilty and selling me up the river then <yikes>
 
We should have killed Nev. They knew Valley would be investigated and could easily have flipped. My bad. I wasn't on and did none of the 3. Why don't we lynch Valley and Nev? Guaranteed hit?
 
  • Like
Reactions: J. J. McClure
I'm innocent lads. You'll see if I'm lynched. It's Biscan and Tobes/BobbyD we need to go after.
 
I ain't desperate lads. You'll all have egg on your face again. I'll die and the SK will strike again, guaranteed <doh>
 
If valley is innocent then fair play to the dr to flip the results but I'm still sure he's the SK.

If if not then I know I'll look suspicious but prob best to keep an eye on Less Hope as well
 
I want to kill Nev or Valley. I thought we could double lynch but we can't as it goes to a coin toss. I do think its always better when you have the option of multiple lynching.
 
That was foolish last night. A massive error to allow Nev to escape and confusion to reign. I now don't know if he is a baddie, but I was more sure than I was of Gerrez. It would have told us more as he had been investigated. Gerrez hadn't so we learned feck all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Super G Ted'inho
InBiscanWeTrust said:
If valley is innocent then fair play to the dr to flip the results but I'm still sure he's the SK.

If if not then I know I'll look suspicious but prob best to keep an eye on Less Hope as well
Click to expand...

I wasn't sure about Neville yesterday, but I feel confident that we've got the right man in Valley, his defence has been classic 'caught mafia' imo.

We should lynch him tonight and on the off chance he's innocent that'll mean we have to lynch Neville tomorrow, as we've got literally **** all else to go on. It looks like you're a confirmed innocent though, as you came back clear, and the SK acted, so unless the MD did switch and Valley is being framed, we at least know one definite innocent.
 
I just think there is a lot more chance with Nev. That move by Sebb to re-investigate him was vital. That is the one thing they wouldn't have anticipated - think about it. Valley was one they could easily anticipate.

Nev
 
Surprised Pervert said:
That was foolish last night. A massive error to allow Nev to escape and confusion to reign. I now don't know if he is a baddie, but I was more sure than I was of Gerrez. It would have told us more as he had been investigated. Gerrez hadn't so we learned feck all.
Click to expand...

I fully understand why I was the obvious choice last night, but once I had an opportunity to save myself then it would have been foolish not to take it. I picked Gerrez as I thought he was playing totally different to how he normally does. He is normally on top of the rules and fairly calm, whereas I thought in this game he played it differently and didn't buy his confusion about the rules. As the only confirmed innocent (to myself) it made more sense to make that move and try and lynch someone I thought might be guilty.

Its still possible that the result was flipped last night too, but I found it telling that Valley immediately tried to discredit Biscan rather than trying to establish if Biscan's message was genuine. That has made me think that Valley is acting more defensively than I'd have expected. If we lynch Valley tonight and he is innocent then I expect to be up **** creek without a paddle.
 
Less Hope Than Neville said:
I fully understand why I was the obvious choice last night, but once I had an opportunity to save myself then it would have been foolish not to take it. I picked Gerrez as I thought he was playing totally different to how he normally does. He is normally on top of the rules and fairly calm, whereas I thought in this game he played it differently and didn't buy his confusion about the rules. As the only confirmed innocent (to myself) it made more sense to make that move and try and lynch someone I thought might be guilty.

Its still possible that the result was flipped last night too, but I found it telling that Valley immediately tried to discredit Biscan rather than trying to establish if Biscan's message was genuine. That has made me think that Valley is acting more defensively than I'd have expected. If we lynch Valley tonight and he is innocent then I expect to be up **** creek without a paddle.
Click to expand...

Of course it's not genuine, it's a con as I'm innocent.
 
I don't know Sebb being innocent threw me. With Gerrez I wasn't surprised when I found out it had gone to a coin flip on him, I had no real suspicion of him. Yeah he went after Tobes and went a bit crazy. ACS does likewise, but I trust ACS less. He's a devious bastard like myself.

What is the vote at this stage. I suspect Bobby and ACS by the way too. Both have made votes which have had to be corrected by the gamesmaster. Now it could be innocent errors or they could have voted knowing full well their votes wouldn't count. More so in Bobby's case leaving Nev (SK) a way out. I am kicking myself for not logging on last night :mad:
 
  • Like
Reactions: J. J. McClure
Guys we need to lynch valley. F he turns out to be innocent then so be it, then we switch to nev (or me if people think I was making things up) but I think most believe that I'm only passing on my investigation result and am innocent.

It it seems a lot of people are being quiet and not talking let alone even voting at the moment.

Are they playing a game and being quiet in background or just not playing at all?
 
InBiscanWeTrust said:
Guys we need to lynch valley. F he turns out to be innocent then so be it, then we switch to nev (or me if people think I was making things up) but I think most believe that I'm only passing on my investigation result and am innocent.

It it seems a lot of people are being quiet and not talking let alone even voting at the moment.

Are they playing a game and being quiet in background or just not playing at all?
Click to expand...

We'll find out mate, if both the bad guys are 2 of the current seemingly 'inactives' that'd be hilarious tbf like. <laugh>

If Valley does turn out to be innocent than it'd make you 100% innocent, as it'd mean that Valley was the subject of the MD's switch and the SK acted, so you'd be in the clear.

So in that scenario the next for the lynch would have to be Neville.

The group is split on this one and maybe a coin toss is the best result here.
 
Scores on the doors:

Nev - Me, ACS, Valley
Valley - BobbyD, Biscan, Tobes

I had Biscan down as innocent. My investigation said so. Now if that was flipped that would mean him and Bobby could well be in cahoots (as BobbyD also investigated Biscan). Nev has been held up as the SK and so has Valley. Neither might be as those who investigated them might have info flipped or the SK /MD could be just saing they investigated people when they haven't.

I go back to Sebb re-investigating Nev. That is the only time a curve ball has been thrown at them. Valley being SK could have been flipped easily as we even told them we were investigating him. Sebb said nothing and just re-investigated. On all known info it has to be Nev who goes down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back