i don't think I can accept that argument. The thing is, Bertrand was never a bad player and he has shown that in his time with Chelsea. That's why I knew we were getting a good player when we bought him.
I really haven't watch him much in Villa, but I'm starting to suspect he wasn't really that bad at Villa, I think now it has come to that that we repeat opinions of a few Villa fans who might not have a clue.
He was awful at Villa and didn't really play regularly at Chelsea. Do you not think it'd a bit strange to counter someone's argument by saying that you haven't seen someone at a club and then say you "suspect"?? Latvian didn't say Oriol was bad, just pointed at the stats from when he played. Look at Villas stats when Ryan played and then that's a fair comparison and perhaps my view (not argument) is then seen as an equal or fair comparison.
I should have expanded by saying that he is an example of a player who didn't play much for his parent club and then played for a team who were very poor, he didn't play well and they finished fighting relegation almost. To me that sounds worse than Oriol.
Performances at one club, good or bad, don't necessarily reflect on possible performance at a new club. If you don't believe me, ask Liverpoool
Last edited:
