Off Topic NEW GAME SIGNUP

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Votes table for Wednesday night
2 Less Hope (Gerrez, Bobby D)


ACS you voted last night to lynch you blood soaked fruit bat, if you're innocent, you have to investigate or hide like a coward tonight remember ;);)
 
Last edited:
If 3 people investigate the same person, they receive the same result, period. The MD/SK MUST confirm their actions before nightfall, same as everyone else.
 
TheJudeanPeoplesFront said:
If 3 people investigate the same person, they receive the same result, period. The MD/SK MUST confirm their actions before nightfall, same as everyone else.
Click to expand...

Would say this makes my result a touch more likely to be true. Guessing either

A) Valley is MD and deliberately pretended an investigation and didn't expect No Chance to be re-investigated so quickly, or
B) Valley is innocent and MD deliberately flipped SK investigation on first night.

Difficult to believe that with No Chance being innocent on first night that MD would flip his result on second night in hope that No Chance would be re-investigated the next night.
 
Why do we have folk saying they are investigating or otherwise. Unless of course you are just doing the old double bluff which is fine.
 
Is the current voting this...

2 Less Hope (Gerrez, Bobby D)

...?
 
Sebb's Campaign Manager said:
Would say this makes my result a touch more likely to be true. Guessing either

A) Valley is MD and deliberately pretended an investigation and didn't expect No Chance to be re-investigated so quickly, or
B) Valley is innocent and MD deliberately flipped SK investigation on first night.

Difficult to believe that with No Chance being innocent on first night that MD would flip his result on second night in hope that No Chance would be re-investigated the next night.
Click to expand...

Only one person can be protected (aka result flipped for them) each night so why not investigate all three in question? Investigate Neville, Sebb and Valley and see what happens. I would suggest we don't listen to investigation reports from those three since they're the ones under discussion. Of course, the result for Neville could have been randomly flipped last night meaning all three could be innocent too.
 
Surprised Pervert said:
Why do we have folk saying they are investigating or otherwise. Unless of course you are just doing the old double bluff which is fine.
Click to expand...

Or treble bluff :bandit:

Pretty ****ing obvious what I'm doing atm since we agreed for two lynch votes to be placed <grr>
 
Sebb's Campaign Manager said:
Would say this makes my result a touch more likely to be true. Guessing either

A) Valley is MD and deliberately pretended an investigation and didn't expect No Chance to be re-investigated so quickly, or
B) Valley is innocent and MD deliberately flipped SK investigation on first night.

Difficult to believe that with No Chance being innocent on first night that MD would flip his result on second night in hope that No Chance would be re-investigated the next night.
Click to expand...

This has confused me. The last point is particularly telling. I had you down as definite innocent but this throws doubt on it in my mind. Why would the MD choose me to set up after I was investigated on day one? I know the investigation was switched so this adds confusion in my mind.


Sebb's Campaign Manager said:
Not obvious. You can hide or investigate.

Or help the SK!!
Click to expand...

Your behaviour is confusing me. You say on the one hand that your info on me is almost certainly correct and yet you now seem to be attacking Gerrez when it is fairly obvious that we cannot be on the same side when he was the first to jump on me with a vote and he has been my main suspect since he suddenly appeared yesterday afternoon.
 
Less Hope Than Neville said:
This has confused me. The last point is particularly telling. I had you down as definite innocent but this throws doubt on it in my mind. Why would the MD choose me to set up after I was investigated on day one? I know the investigation was switched so this adds confusion in my mind.




Your behaviour is confusing me. You say on the one hand that your info on me is almost certainly correct and yet you now seem to be attacking Gerrez when it is fairly obvious that we cannot be on the same side when he was the first to jump on me with a vote and he has been my main suspect since he suddenly appeared yesterday afternoon.
Click to expand...

I think you protsteth too much.

Firstly, two results. One saying innocent and the other SK. Obviously both cannot be right. If mine was flipped, as you would argue, why would the MD flip an investigate on someone who has already been investigated just the night before in the hope that that person might be investigated again. Possible but less likely to be true.

Second point. Banter.

Okay Serial. I hope you don't mind me calling you Serial.
 
Sebb's Campaign Manager said:
I think you protsteth too much.

Firstly, two results. One saying innocent and the other SK. Obviously both cannot be right. If mine was flipped, as you would argue, why would the MD flip an investigate on someone who has already been investigated just the night before in the hope that that person might be investigated again. Possible but less likely to be true.

Second point. Banter.

Okay Serial. I hope you don't mind me calling you Serial.
Click to expand...

You've just made the same point as I did. I don't understand why they would switch it on me when I had already been investigated. Either inspired or stupid. Or we're not getting the full story from you. If I know that I am innocent (which I do) then it has to be one of those three possiibilities. You can't answer the first two if they occured, so on point three - is there something you aren't telling us?
 
Less Hope Than Neville said:
You've just made the same point as I did. I don't understand why they would switch it on me when I had already been investigated. Either inspired or stupid. Or we're not getting the full story from you. If I know that I am innocent (which I do) then it has to be one of those three possiibilities. You can't answer the first two if they occured, so on point three - is there something you aren't telling us?
Click to expand...

No.









Except for JPF's claim that I was at Mr Buster's house for some "hard Botty bashing".

:bandit:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back