Off Topic NEW GAME SIGNUP

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Revenge voting hey, poor effort that [HASHTAG]#standardskmove[/HASHTAG]

lol, you only voted me as I took the piss about your supposed 'forgetting' about the game starting, and made a joke suggested you were the SK.

[HASHTAG]#guiltyaction[/HASHTAG]
 
  • Like
Reactions: J. J. McClure
lol, you only voted me as I took the piss about your supposed 'forgetting' about the game starting, and made a joke suggested you were the SK.

[HASHTAG]#guiltyaction[/HASHTAG]

No, I voted for you because you're a **** :)

(and because you accuse me in every game <laugh>)
 
I have a question @TheJudeanPeoplesFront
The doctor can switch investigation results, and from the OP he can do it multiple nights in a row.
Can he decide to switch the results on the SK every night? Or does he have to alternate between himself and the SK?

The way I read it the Mad Doc will be protecting either himself or the SK every night, so we could catch one of them in our investigations but not two.

On whether to reveal our results: if you identify one of the 2 bad guys then definitely reveal!
I think we should reveal our results although it will help the bad guys figure out who was hiding, but it's only a 50% chance of success anyway so I think we should focus on catching the bad guys ASAP.

To help clarify when investigations occur I propose we state when the investigation happened, in case someone delays revealing their results.

My result:
Day 1: Tennisball investigates Sebb and he was INNOCENT.

The MD can flip results on whomever he wishes regardless of who he flipped results on the previous night. Either an innocent to show as guilty, or himself/SK to show as innocent. He can do it as often on one player, and consecutively, as he wishes.

The only way you can realistically catch them, by investigation alone, is if the SK attempts a kill and you lot investigate the one who isn't covered...
 
  • Like
Reactions: J. J. McClure
Investigations Revealed So Far


Sebb - Innocent (Tennisball Day 1).
Rolando - Innocent (IBWT Day 1)
Surprised Pervert - Innocent (Neville Day 1).
IBWT - Innocent (SP Day 1)
Neville - Innocent (Valley Day 1)

Players who have not been investigated:
Nolberto -
Shimmy -
ACS -
Tash -
Tobes -
Gerrez -
Valley -
Bobby D -
Tennis -

We know that a maximum of 1 of the above investigations is wrong (as the SK killed). Possibly none wrong if the bad guys weren't investigated. I think we should be focussing on that bottom group tonight (I know - I would say that) and then we can look for inconsistencies in the two sets of results compared to actions/non-actions. Those who investigated last night or who vote today cannot investigate so we need the rest to step up to the plate. A few regular players on that list who have been very quiet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.