Police wrong for using water cannons on rioters?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Yes the team were walking toward Ardoyne and they were obviously identified as Catholic and so a loyalist mob set on them. You do have the abillity to read don't you?

No it's okay, because those thugs must have been provoked. As Rebelbhoy said provoking people makes mindless violence and thuggery "understandable."
 
Yes the team were walking toward Ardoyne and they were obviously identified as Catholic and so a loyalist mob set on them. You do have the abillity to read don't you?

His reading is fine, it is comprehension he is having trouble with.
 
His lump sided views only portray him as a bitter lad sympathetic to the thugs ruining this country.

His constant personal attacks on myself and his assumptions of my religion and political beliefs only make him look immature.

His avoidance of certain topics only cement the fact that he is incapable of a reasonable, sensible debate.

But if he's happy with that, then fair do's.
 
I honestly believe he is the biggest Bigot on here yet accuses others of being so to hide his sheer hatred for anything slightly linked to being Protestant or a Rangers fan anyone who reads this board all the way through will see that and when he is hit with facts he simply deflects.
He tries to pick holes in others arguments but offers no real opinion himself except if you provoke people they will attack ****e, do yourself a favour Wodewick and learn to respect others faiths and beliefs.
 
what is a lump sided view?
what assumptions did I make about your religion?

are you capable of reasoned debate? I asked you a dozen or so pages ago if it was acceptable for the sectarian OO to provoke this situation in the first place?

i never got an answer.

you suggested I am unreasonable. what exactly is unreasonable?
 
I honestly believe he is the biggest Bigot on here yet accuses others of being so to hide his sheer hatred for anything slightly linked to being Protestant or a Rangers fan anyone who reads this board all the way through will see that and when he is hit with facts he simply deflects.
He tries to pick holes in others arguments but offers no real opinion himself except if you provoke people they will attack ****e, do yourself a favour Wodewick and learn to respect others faiths and beliefs.

bullshit

you asked my opinion. I gave it.

if you can't read, that ain't my problem
 
Typical, the Gers fans piling in to side with Medro.

It really is beyond ****ing pathetic.

Rebel ignore these chumps and let them claim victory, even neutrals like Jacky can see what they are about.
 
Typical, the Gers fans piling in to side with Medro.

It really is beyond ****ing pathetic.

Reebl ignore these chumps and let them claim victory, even neutrals like Jacky can see what they are about.

I'm a neutral, and though I think Medro's motivation for posting this article is far from innocent, I still think he's come out of this better than Rebel.
 
i know I should Dev.

It could have been an interesting debate.

LOL Dev and Webs the new Mitchells brothers Ha Ha:

Dev: Leave it Webs they ain't worth it bruv

Webs: I know mucka but they irritate me so facking mach, wait till mam hears bout this.
 
i know I should Dev.

It could have been an interesting debate.

Medro was offered a chance to debate the trouble of the last week but chose to ignore it until some Catholics were involved and identified as the "troublemakers", then he was only too willing to pipe up.

That's why I refuse to get involved in a debate with him, he has shown time and again that he only cares about a story if blame can be apportioned to the particular side he has a grievance with. It is usually Celtic fans who are his focus.