No, neither have you!It was invitational to cities with trade fairs until the season after you won it. After that season you had finish runner up to qualify then they quickly turned it into the Uafa cup. You won a competition London XI finished runner up in one season. To add, you finished tenth in the league the season you got in.
![]()
Love the mis-quoting of facts by you, Funky.

All competitions are invitational in the widest meaning of that word, including today's Champions League.
Newcastle did not gain entry to the competition because we had a trade fair. All teams in the then First Division would have been able to play in the competition subject to them qualifying pursuant to the then prevailing rules. We did. The fact we were tenth really has nothing to do with it. The rules were set out before the season began and we qualified. No arguement.
It was at that time recognised as being the third competition in Europe behind the European Cup and the Cup Winner's Cup. Also the fact that all of the London teams combined (London XI) were unable to manage to do what we did manage to do I think shows how good we were, wouldn't you agree?
I noticed you also missed re-quoting the first part of the previous point made by me in relation to Fredor's huge claim about your lots Premier League achievements and assume you accept my point as being correct in any event. No doubt if my assumption is wrong you will let me know.

It was invitational to cities with trade fairs until the season after you won it. After that season you had finish runner up to qualify then they quickly turned it into the Uafa cup. You won a competition London XI finished runner up in one season. To add, you finished tenth in the league the season you got in. 
Accepting defeat and being wrong is always at the start of the path to enlightenment