Sterling's best goals for Liverpool - 43 seconds long 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/33502295

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/33502295

Sterling's best goals for Liverpool - 43 seconds long
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/33502295

He will be a great player for City and add pace to the attacking threat they have from midfield.
very poor wum effort there.

....or he could just be giving his opinion.very poor wum effort there.
As it wasn't a wum I forgive you. Unless you think Toure, Nasri and Silva are quick players![]()

As it wasn't a wum I forgive you. Unless you think Toure, Nasri and Silva are quick players![]()
about 42 seconds longer than the compilation for Borini, Lambert and Balotelli
![]()
Toure is a star / key player for them, Stelring's not taking his place. Silva, Nasri and Navas are all better players than Raheem too. However, you're right, when Sterling does play he is able to offer more pace tot he team. there won't be much else without lots of hard work though.
Toure is a star / key player for them, Stelring's not taking his place. Silva, Nasri and Navas are all better players than Raheem too. However, you're right, when Sterling does play he is able to offer more pace tot he team. there won't be much else without lots of hard work though.
I think he will offer more than Navas but will learn from crafty players like Silva. If I were Nasri I would be worried about my place in the side. He wont replace Toure as he is a beast who when on his game can do it all.He won't replace Toure because Toure plays a CM (which is suicidal because he's a liability there).
He won't displace Silva for obvious reasons but I do think he'll be ahead of Nasri and Navas.
You beat me to it Tobes

I'd play Nasri ahead of Sterling.
Of course he'll play ffs. They've not shelled out £44m for a bench warmer.
He'll start the season ahead of Navas without a shadow of a doubt.

You sure? It is Man City we're talking about![]()