I've come to the conclusion that some of you are insane.
I've come to the conclusion that some of you are insane.
I'm with you Beef! 
Just checked again as that was this morning, and I can't find one bookmaker taking bets as present.Thats interesting. Spurs drifting insted of their price shortening. They were 1/3 yesterday.
I've come to the conclusion that some of you are insane.
You could have quoted yourself from last summer with this comment surely?I've come to the conclusion that some of you are insane.
This, also.Same applies here, really - plus I'm meant to be working, so C&P time...
You must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see media
We do not know what is going or gone on. How do we know if Saints didn't say we will give you the extra cash but AM being pissed off about the leaked news refused? We simply have no idea what is going on apart from:Putting the "is it, isn't it" a contract situation with Atletico to one side, the guy is potentially going to be signed for £11m on £50kpw. That is very well within our means, particularly for a player we know and want to keep. I understand the arguments here regarding a moral stance but I can't help feeling that we'll be cutting our nose off to spite our face if we lose out as a direct consequence of our stance.
Contractual situations like this do occur frequently outside the arena of football. You just have to roll with the punches and do what's right for you.
So we should accept AM not following a legally signed agreement and say "**** it, it doesn't matter that we had a agreed fee. That's hand you some more money anyways"?'Why would we pay more if we can get him for 7 milion pounds' is a non-argument, really, since it seems we can't get him for 7 milion pounds, otherwise we would. So, it comes to this - 'we should pay more because we can't get him for 7 milion pounds.' That's why.
*headdesk*'Why would we pay more if we can get him for 7 milion pounds' is a non-argument, really, since it seems we can't get him for 7 milion pounds, otherwise we would. So, it comes to this - 'we should pay more because we can't get him for 7 milion pounds.' That's why.
So we should accept AM not following a legally signed agreement and say "**** it, it doesn't matter that we had a agreed fee. That's hand you some more money anyways"?
Exactly. Some people seem to be under the impression that our ability to do deals that suit us left with Nicola Cortese. If we threw money at Atletico to get Toby what would that do for our reputation the next time a bit of hard bargaining over a player... let's see, say, Morgan Schneiderlin... was called for? Woodward would be laughing up his sleeve at us for being the incompetent idiots some of you would like us to be.So we should accept AM not following a legally signed agreement and say "**** it, it doesn't matter that we had a agreed fee. That's hand you some more money anyways"?
So you choose to let a club that has acted illegally get away with it? As Chilco said we would be seen as a club that can get walked over.If the options are to either insist that we had a deal and consequently lose the player to Tottenham, or ignore the deal and pay some more money to get the player, then I choose the second option.