The bid for what?
**** me this is hard work. For a contracted player (Ings) whos contract did not expire until July 1st.
The bid for what?
They were selling a contracted player. On the first of July Ings became a free agent so Burnley are now asking for compensation based on what they could have got whilst he was still under contract![]()
**** me this is hard work. For a contracted player (Ings) whos contract did not expire until July 1st.
Yes, but when does the transfer officially take place? And is the player still theirs to sell at that point in time?

When did the transfer window open...? Could Ings have moved BEFORE 1 July?
He is no longer in contract so is not theirs to sell. The valuation is based on what they could have received (had he accepted) whilst still under contract![]()

He is no longer in contract so is not theirs to sell. The valuation is based on what they could have received (had he accepted) whilst still under contract![]()
Indeed.
For a player they couldn't buy until the contract had expired?
Makes no difference, it was a valid offer and it was accepted by the (then) owners of his registration.
Aside from the fact that it's compensation that's going to be paid and not a valuation, hey couldn't have received that amount (as a transfer fee) because at no point could they close the deal.
Aside from the fact that it's compensation that's going to be paid and not a valuation, hey couldn't have received that amount (as a transfer fee) because at no point could they close the deal.

Makes no difference, it was a valid offer and it was accepted by the (then) owners of his registration.
If he was going abroad, Burnley would only get compensation covering what they'd spent on him excluding transfer fees and wages. They'd have got about £300k. Burnley should be grateful he stayed in this country as they'll get a lot more compensation as a result.

Valid offer. Yes. Accepted. Yes. Ever going to be paid? No.
What if Ings had said ok to Spurs?
And if all had gone well with negotiations, do you think Spurs would have paid £12m when they knew full well they could get him for a lot less...? Or do you think they were using a loop hole to enable them to speak to Ings first?

What if Ings had said ok to Spurs?
I'll refer to my first question to you in post [HASHTAG]#10319[/HASHTAG] that you deemed irrelevant...
...![]()
