Fergie on a good day.....
You must log in or register to see images
ah too true and united were probably 3-0 up!
Fergie on a good day.....
You must log in or register to see images
Fergie has said that Nasri won't join Utd, but that 'I think he has agreed to go somewhere else."
Firstly it is up to Wenger to decide what happens to Narsi this season as he is still under contract with us.
Secondly, Fergie's guesswork is neither welcome nor invited. It's disrespectful to the player, Wenger and Arsenal.
Thirdly, if it were Wenger speculating on one of Utd's players, you can bet that Fergie would throw a hissy fit and turn a shade deeper than his expensive clarets.
Poor behaviour from Fergie in my opinion

I don't think soCareful Piskie your have all the bullies cohorts over here whinging![]()

Fergie has said that Nasri won't join Utd, but that 'I think he has agreed to go somewhere else."
Firstly it is up to Wenger to decide what happens to Narsi this season as he is still under contract with us.
Secondly, Fergie's guesswork is neither welcome nor invited. It's disrespectful to the player, Wenger and Arsenal.
Thirdly, if it were Wenger speculating on one of Utd's players, you can bet that Fergie would throw a hissy fit and turn a shade deeper than his expensive clarets.
Poor behaviour from Fergie in my opinion
It could be that he enquired about Nasri and was told that a deal had already been done with someone else.
PISKIE do you also think it's bad Wenger talking about Citeh to the press today ? as I'm not sure if it was welcome or invited ?
Etihad is owned by the Abu Dhabi government and the airline’s association with the City owner, Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan, a member of the Abu Dhabi royal family, is prompting particular suspicion. City now have five sponsorship deals from companies based in Abu Dhabi.
is right. I would suggest that the Etihad deal doesn't represent a fair market value and instead represents the owners of Man City being able to do an 'in house' deal that financially benefits the club and circumvents the FIFA fair play rules.“We must have done a bad deal”
Let's not forget that Etihad have NEVER posted a trading or operating profit since their formation in 2004 which tends to make one question how a loss making company can afford that kind, in fact any kind, of money.
If nothing else then Uefa should put in a clause in the FFP rules that loss making companies are barred from entering into any form of sponsorship deals.

and who were perhaps linked to the club via, say, I don't know, someome like Sheik Mansour for example 
Let's be honest Nasri is probably going to leave this summer.

Except he's not![]()
So just for the sake of being stubborn you are going to keep a player who doesnt want to be there, pay all his wages, he'll sulk all season and then come next summer he'll leave to go United or City for free. Great logic Wenger. He's losing the plot.
So just for the sake of being stubborn you are going to keep a player who doesnt want to be there, pay all his wages, he'll sulk all season and then come next summer he'll leave to go United or City for free. Great logic Wenger. He's losing the plot.
Let's be honest Nasri is probably going to leave this summer. If he doesn't sign a new contract he will leave on a free next summer. It looks as though the only two teams that want him are United and City. Either way it's going to be a massive blow to Arsenal, whoever he goes to.
Who's to say that he won't sign the new contract on the table? Also your assumption about him sulking is wrong. He was reported to be smiling and enjoying himself in our pre season tour of Malaysia. So it looks as though his comment that his is 'committed' to Arsenal was born out on the tour. He will be an Arsenal player at least for another season, and quite possibly for quite a few years yet.
Your comment smacks of the same Jealousy that Fergie had when he realised that Nasri wouldn't be joining Utd.