I'm in panic mode now,
SIR TENNISBALL
Re-reading the voting patterns. Looking for "evidence" the only concrete evidence we have is Sir T on MITO's 2/3 - 1/3 basis. The rest is guesswork and "tells" and voting patterns where everyone is in the dark.
Investigations may have been affected re Valley but past games as someone else said only one person's investigations would be affected (I think) not everyones. So why should MITO's be affected just because MITO's was. That still leaves the 2/3 - 1/3 point but that was never tested and on re-reading is the hardest piece of evidence any of us have. That is why I have changed my vote to Sir T.
Comments.
Well this just got even more interesting

It's a definite possibility. I'm not going to try and curry favour with you though. I still suspect either Lucaas or yourself. Lucaas more so for the reasons I have given. I think we will know more about you once Lucaas has gone. I guess that doesn't help me with you, but I'm sticking to what I believe.