Off Topic Afcftw Mafia Game

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lucaaas (3): Sebbs campaign manager, Sir tennisball, Less Hope than Neville
Bodanki (1): BobbyD
Less Hope than Neville (2): Bodanki, lucaaas

Yet to vote: Swarbs
 
Hell, I'm even more confused now than before.

:emoticon-0141-whew:

I'm back to being totally uncertain.

My vote is staying for now with Lucaas but if Lucaas and Bodanki want to persuade me I'm all ears.

Edit : Obi if nothing else you have played your role perfectly but then again I don't think you're actually playing your role as opposed to just being yourself.

Have had suspicions about No Chance being the SK and just coming across as Town as needed the Town's help to survive.
 
Last edited:
So which of the three voting for Lucaas ISNT mafia,
gotta think one of them is the serial killer
 
Sebb's Campaign Manager said:
Hell, I'm even more confused now than before.

:emoticon-0141-whew:

I'm back to being totally uncertain.

My vote is staying for now with Lucaas but if Lucaas and Bodanki want to persuade me I'm all ears.

Edit : Obi if nothing else you have played your role perfectly but then again I don't think you're actually playing your role as opposed to just being yourself.

Have had suspicions about No Chance being the SK and just coming across as Town as needed the Town's help to survive.
Click to expand...

They are playing with us Sebb. Looks like my pairings from this morning might have had something to them after all.

The nights we have stuck to our guns we have taken out Tobes and Mikey. The nights we have allowed ourselves to get swayed late on we have taken out innocent townies.

Not much more I can say. I think I've proved myself as a townie but the rest is now down to you guys. But if you lynch me we're down to 3 townies max and both mafia will still be alive.
 
Sir Tennisball said:
We don't know what went wrong with the investigations but they've been screwed with somehow. This is what we think happened but no one knows for sure until afc reveals all his hidden powers and roles.

Day 1 investigations were correct when Valley got a NON TOWN read on Tobes & its meant to be 100% correct, and was proved true. At the same time it seems via Neville's posts about the tags & ACS liking his comment that ACS investigated Funky on day 1 and got a TOWN read, and that was correct too. Acs had a 25% chance of investigating but it should be 100% accurate as far as we know.

Day 2 something happened, we don't know what but a few people think it might have been a secret mafia power. Suddenly investigations got switched around and seemed to return incorrect results. Valley investigated Mito and got a NON TOWN result, this was meant to be 100% accurate and yet mito was TOWN, so we know that was 100% the incorrect investigation result somehow.

On the same day mito investigated me and got a NON TOWN result, as drunk PI his investigations are 67% accurate according to the OP (he didnt investigate night 1). Both these guys revealed themselves and we spent the next 2 days debating the results. I thought I had just been unlucky due to the 33% incorrect result coming up on me, as I'm a no role townie. As valley was correct on Tobes there was a lot of confusion as most players had town reads on both mito and myself, eventually a bunch of people realised that the investigations might well be wrong so they switched their votes away from the two of us.

Unfortunately mito was killed by the meth head, he was asking to be killed to prove his innocence and to have his weekend free... After he died and was shown to be town people realised the investigations were stuffed. There was always an element of doubt about me being non town due to the 33% chance of incorrect result, and after realising that investigations could not be trusted more people believed i was town, mostly due to the way i had been posting throughout the game & voted.
Click to expand...

Just catching up. FYI MITO investigation of you was on night 1.
 
At times like this you actually begin to get a degree of insight.

Problem is, is that my insight is as to how brilliantly clever are those ostriches that stick there head in the sand...
 
Did AFC ever post a table confirming curreng team numbers? Or is he being a meanie? <laugh>
 
I'm in panic mode now,

:emoticon-0107-sweat

SIR TENNISBALL

Re-reading the voting patterns. Looking for "evidence" the only concrete evidence we have is Sir T on MITO's 2/3 - 1/3 basis. The rest is guesswork and "tells" and voting patterns where everyone is in the dark.

Investigations may have been affected re Valley but past games as someone else said only one person's investigations would be affected (I think) not everyones. So why should MITO's be affected just because Valley's was. That still leaves the 2/3 - 1/3 point but that was never tested and on re-reading is the hardest piece of evidence any of us have. That is why I have changed my vote to Sir T.

Comments.

Edit: to correct name.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back