Thats what's bothering me, for the mafia OR the Meth head to kill by flu?! Nah
Also didnt it say the mafia had "two bullets". So one was a flu bullet?
And a meth head took the time to buy a virus (with all the money that meth heads have) store it, disperse it into the target...blah blah
Wouldn't a meth head just beat someone to death?
On the Gerrez kill.
Don't assume anything.
I can't tell.
The mafia cam kill in methods known only to them.
We just don't know what is what.
The fact is Gerrez died. Of the flu.
We really need more voices giving input.
You know who do go to extraordinary lengths to come up with elaborate ways to kill people - serial killers!
OK, here's a suggestion so far out of the box it's forgotten what the box looks like...
There are question marks around why MITO would not at least try and discourage Valley from investigating him and/or killing Valley.
There is a small chance that MITO is being truthful, and his posts seem helpful to the town.
There is a small chance that the Mafia can give Valley dud info through some unknown power (I think we know Vally is who he says he is).
MITO has said that Tennis is mafia.
Tennis says he is an innocent townie.
MITO claims to be PI (tho when we needed it tonight he conveniently investigated Gerrez).
We could lynch Tennis (knowing he has no role) and if he is proved to be a townie then I say the circumstantial evidence is beyond doubt and we lynch MITO then?
Just putting it out there for discussion - not saying we do it.
But the methead had to kill..and only tobes (lynched)and gerrez died.
I'm inclined to join you in that left field of yours.
MITO has been a two faced, dodgy, manipulating, under-handed, deceptive barsteward since I first came across him but if Mr Murray turns out to be a townie then he dies.
We really need more voices giving input.
So is it your invesitgations that have a 1/3 chance of being wrong? I am confusedCare to give a reason?
Mito is the wrong way to go here guys.
So is it your invesitgations that have a 1/3 chance of being wrong? I am confused
So is it your invesitgations that have a 1/3 chance of being wrong? I am confused
Oh thanks... highly insulting that.

Mine have been 100% accurate. I see no reason to doubt the latest investigative results.
I wish I had not saved you as I thought maybe you were activating something.
I'd love to know what you are at.
One or two possibilities come to mind