Does reading back through the last 10 pages or so count as work?
It didn't even help. We have one very obvious (and sensible) target, but then we hit trouble. Everybody has both plausible excuses and holes in their arguments.
The new questions I have from reading back are:
1. If MITO is the PI, it would be really helpful to know if 1 in every 3 answers will be wrong or if there is a 1 in 3 chance of his answers being wrong. There is a difference. If it's the first option then chances are tennisball is mafia as I can't see the sense in him being given bad info on his first go (along with everything else that happened that is). If it's the second option then he might be wrong about Tennis but could also be wrong next time too.
2. Where was Nolberto yesterday and why suddenly appear today? Was he told he had to be silent on day one? Does he have a role?
3. I am genuinely confused as to how we check out MITO. His actions could all be bad (kill/info) and yet he could still be the PI.