Johnson formally charged

Absolutely brilliant character..

 

Sunderland footballer Adam Johnson 'to deny' child sex charges
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-32777071

 

Sunderland footballer Adam Johnson 'to deny' child sex charges

• 1 hour ago
  
• From the sectionTyne & Wear

please log in to view this image

Adam Johnson arrived at court with his partner Stacey Flounders
England and Sunderland footballer Adam Johnson will deny having sexual activity with a 15-year-old girl, a court has been told.

The 27-year-old, from Castle Eden, County Durham, was arrested in March.

His solicitor told magistrates in Peterlee he intended to deny three counts of sexual activity with a child under 16 and another of grooming.

The player was released on conditional bail to appear before Durham Crown Court on 3 June.

The court was told the three counts of sexual activity with a child are alleged to have taken place on one night in January at two locations in County Durham, while the grooming offence was said to have happened between December and February.

Born in Sunderland, Johnson began his career at Middlesbrough before moving to Manchester City and then Sunderland for £10m in 2012.

During the five-minute hearing, his solicitor, Paul Morris, indicated he would plead not guilty when he next appeared in court.

He did not comment as he left court with his partner Stacey Flounders and was driven away in a Range Rover

 

The BBC just reported this as a sex attack!

 

please log in to view this image

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1342688/Joanna-Yeates-landlord-Chris-Jefferies-car-seized-arrest-suspicion-murder.html

 

Don't know how that case hasn't caused reform of the press in our country.

 

Given the decency of most NUFC fans and fellow North Eastern people..I can't envisage anyone being bent enough or prejudiced enough to stitch someone up on this. I could though envisage a collective fury if he is proven guilty and a collective togetherness if he is innocent...but not anything else IMHO

 

Exactly Funk. The Police have no choice..the CPS have less choice. If they reject the case an d it is later proven true they are on are a hiding to nothing. If they try the case and are proven wrong they are doing their job. There is not ever smoke without fire but the key is how much fire,

 

See he's pleaded not guilty to all charges today.

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11695/9873870/sunderlands-adam-johnson-pleads-not-guilty

21st September for the trial, it's gonna drag into another season for you guys. Not the best news I guess.

 

It really bugs me how these things take so long. I'm sure that both the prosecution and the defence have everything they need, so why the delay?

 

Dunno mate, concrete Tony or MontysOptician I think could answer that one.

Maybe they need to find a gap of X amount of days where everybody can be gathered, or maybe paperwork, getting the jury together etc. It's all bollocks innit, just give him 10 minutes with Jeremy Kyle and a lie detector and have done with it.

 

Haway mate, how these judges ever gonna improve their golf handicaps if they spend all day in court!

Be reasonable man!

 

Is there a jury involved though? I know someone that was convicted in a magistrates court and decided against appealing because the retrial would have involved a high court judge and two magistrates (I think) but his solicitor said there was no jury and the judge involved was a complete and utter b***ard if he was found guilty again. It may depend on the type of charge but one of the legal eagles on here might be able to enlighten us.

 

I think a trial involves a jury by default doesn't it?

I dunno mate, the only time I ever gave evidence in my old job was to get assets frozen and it never required crown court.

 

It may have something to do with it originally being tried in a magistrates court but as I say one of the more genned up on here may be able to clarify

 

I'm almost certain that this will be held at a Crown Court which entails a jury..

 

Isn't there some sort of maximum sentence that a Mag's court can hand out? Like 6 months or something? No chance it's gonna be anywhere other than Crown if that's the case.

 

I think they can go up to a year at a magistrates court, but the principle still stands..

 

It being over before the new year and It being the last year of his contract softens the blow if he's guilty.

 

It will be in front of a jury, maximum sentence exceeds what the mags can hand out. Those sort of jail stretches needs a jury and a crown court.