We'll see. I think it will be one word against the other and it will get messy for both AJ and the Lass.
Well what I meant was, when somebody gets found not guilty some people say "I see that bastard has got away with that." I've heard it a hundred times & I'm like, "no, he's been found not guilty, different thing."
"Le Vell, 48, denies five counts of rape, three of indecent assault, two counts of sexual activity with a child, and two of causing a child to engage in sexual activity". No mention of grooming in that exhaustive list.
Oh yes, most of these will be idiots who aren't in hold of the facts either, guaranteed, people who'll accept the justice system only when it suits. ****ers in other words, their response when you ask them on what basis did they think he was guilty? Will quickly separate the ****ers from those with a genuine opinion.
Must have been some more then. I know that people can be charged for even suggesting that they'd be up for meeting, in police stings for example, where the '*****' would be baited, so the evidence they have could literally be nothing or a whole world of ****, we just won't know until the case.
Could be mate, but I think grooming is a bit more 'long term' if you like, that bold bit you highlighted could be anything.
groom ɡruːm/ verb gerund or present participle: grooming 2. prepare or train (someone) for a particular purpose or activity.
not guilty until proven otherwise for me as well. on another note, could Sunderland sue him for lost potential sell on fees etc. if he is found guilty?
Although he's no longer getting story lines involving him sleeping around with his best mate's much younger wife.
I wouldn't know mate, I've not watched it for about 5 years. I'm like Scousers where TV is concerned: there's no soap in my house.
