How big will the gap be between cambiasso and Leicester when he doesn't resign ?
With the £150M tv deal from Premier League clubs i think we will be fine.
Enjoy the Dons next year mate.
How big will the gap be between cambiasso and Leicester when he doesn't resign ?
I'm looking forward to it .With the £150M tv deal from Premier League clubs i think we will be fine.
Enjoy the Dons next year mate.
How big will the gap be between cambiasso and Leicester when he doesn't resign ?
Not looking likely at the minute if the media is to be believedI hope he doesn't resign as well.
I'd like him to re-sign though.
Not looking likely at the minute if the media is to be believed
That's a very strange post that could come back to bite you in the ass , to suggest none of the promoted teams will get near you is daft , you ain't that good slight advantage over the three promoted teams but it doesn't always work out , we're living proof of that .
Palace and West Ham won't be near relegation , same could be said of wba under pulis , Newcastle may be down there again and as much as I hate sherwood I think villa will be fine under him .
You are the one talking **** as usual , what is so hard in admitting you will be one of the favourites for the drop ? It's not difficult your a small fish in a big pond , if we had stayed up it would of been our third season in the top flight and still would of been one of the favourites for the drop , to suggest anything otherwise is just stupid and completely biased take your head out of your Leicester bubble and just think about it for a moment . Ps there's only Watford Bournemouth and Sunderland that have shorter odds to go down , does that not make you one of the favourites for the drop ?
That is a total load of tosh , again you lot have a complete biased opinion , again it's all about opinions and again it's going to make me look biased but it you had to make a team out of both of our squads it would have more hull players in it than LeicesterWhat's strange about? I've seen a fair bit of Bournemouth, Watford and Norwich and, unless they make a lot of changes or we lose a lot of key players and don't replace them, they are miles below us in quality, as were you, QPR and Burnley.
We're MUCH better than even our final league position suggests. Unfortunately it took us an age to settle, and for Nige to crack the right formation/team. But when we achieved it, we swept aside everyone but Chelsea (and Sunderland, but we got the result we wanted). If it had happened early, we'd have finished top ten easily.
That is a total load of tosh , again you lot have a complete biased opinion , again it's all about opinions and again it's going to make me look biased but it you had to make a team out of both of our squads it would have more hull players in it than Leicester
You name all these sides which may be correct because some of them seem to struggle every season but I see nothing from Leicester to suggest that they won't be any different from the above .You have survived one season job done , you now have to survive a second season to suggest you will be looking higher up is the views of a Leicester fan only .Un
West Ham have been dropping like a stone. Almost every side that's sacked Alladyce has ended up relegated shortly after.
Palace should be OK, but they will need to hold on to key players, which they may struggle to do as they aren't a big club.
Newcastle and Villa will continue to struggle for the foreseeable.
Yes it's my opinion. You calling my post total tosh is also your opinion, and not fact.
I said all season that Burnley, QPR and Hull were the worst three sides, and guess what? I was right. So I'll stick to my opinion rather than yours, if that's OK.
You name all these sides which may be correct because some of them seem to struggle every season but I see nothing from Leicester to suggest that they won't be any different from the above .You have survived one season job done , you now have to survive a second season to suggest you will be looking higher up is the views of a Leicester fan only .
You went on a great run playing sides at the right end of the season getting a slice of luck in some games , but that won't happen every season
Luck? Again, go and watch the games I mentioned.
You beat west brom when they fluffed a hat full of chances , demolished a qpr side already relegated , and played Swansea when they had no striker or full backs
No of course not but I'm not implying we will fly up the league and shouldn't be looked at as relegation contenders like some Leicester fans are implying . Survive two or three seasons then start looking up surviving one doesn't make you world beaters , how many teams suffer second season syndrome ?Still not seeing the luck aspect. West Brom fluffing loads of chances implies they not good enough up front (which they're not), we'd have beat QPR anyway (Newcastle weren't relegated when we demolished them) and Swansea not having depth in squad is another symptom of them being a small club.
I suppose every side you beat were at the full potential at the time?
I see your points fettis, I guess what the guys are saying is that we'll not be in the bottom 3 favourites as normally it's the 3 promoted sides. Obviously it doesn't always work like that (see ourselves and yourselves). I know what you're saying that we'll still be in the few favourites by the bookies to be just above the bottom 3 . We may finish higher we may not. I see us as a side that can push on and grow rather than go backwards depending how we recruit but it'd be crazy to make any predictions either way at this stageNo of course not but I'm not implying we will fly up the league and shouldn't be looked at as relegation contenders like some Leicester fans are implying . Survive two or three seasons then start looking up surviving one doesn't make you world beaters , how many teams suffer second season syndrome ?