Why are we? Ive never been in a better position than over the past few years.
Is anyone on here in rags, eating out of bins? I doubt it (matth aside)
****ing tory as well

Why are we? Ive never been in a better position than over the past few years.
Is anyone on here in rags, eating out of bins? I doubt it (matth aside)

So according to UIR, the Tories will run the country right. If that doesn't scare you nothing will![]()
We're guaranteed to get continually ****ed for the next five years- in most other circumstances that would sound like a good thing..........

Labour have never brought a living wage and to have one, business needs to be doing well in the first place. Many business owners are anti labour because they are unrealistic.
Zero hour contracts. I had one once. Under labour controlled government. It wasnt pleasant so yes.
The bottom line have to go to foodbanks. People got crisis loans in the past. Turns out people have always struggled, no matter who is in charge.
As for the 1% comment. Welcome to sisu territory. Torys are good for business, this is true. However a thriving business sector is good for the economy which in turn is good for the people. It all trickles down. Will the people at the top stay at the top? Yes. Would that be the case of labour won? Yes.
Labour are a gutless party who try to please all sides but ultimately end up alienating the many. That's not how you run a country.

Right? I doubt that. Its impossible as some will always feel aggrieved no matter what. Thats the nature of it.
What they will do is make the tough calls that others wouldnt. Decisions that may take away from some but reward others.
Especially with ladies of lesser years
[HASHTAG]#gratuitousdescriptionrequired[/HASHTAG]
it's actually more like 0.000001% mate.
Tories are good for business alright, not yours tho.![]()
You must log in or register to see images
Exactly. Because it's always been the rich and powerful who have been in charge and made the decisions to suit themselves.Labour have never brought a living wage and to have one, business needs to be doing well in the first place. Many business owners are anti labour because they are unrealistic.
Zero hour contracts. I had one once. Under labour controlled government. It wasnt pleasant so yes.
The bottom line have to go to foodbanks. People got crisis loans in the past. Turns out people have always struggled, no matter who is in charge.
As for the 1% comment. Welcome to sisu territory. Torys are good for business, this is true. However a thriving business sector is good for the economy which in turn is good for the people. It all trickles down. Will the people at the top stay at the top? Yes. Would that be the case of labour won? Yes.
Labour are a gutless party who try to please all sides but ultimately end up alienating the many. That's not how you run a country.

Im a working class northerner from Burnley. I habe no millions or gold and have no family in places of influence.
If I can be fine, Infact doing rather well, and everyone I know is better off now than under labour.... Its a pretty simple choice.
Don't insult the town of your birth, Burnley has been royally shat on by Tory policies.
You must log in or register to see images
Arts, Culture & Heritage
According to the latest national indicator statistics, only 31% of adults across Burnley engage regularly in the arts, compared to 45% nationally.
You must log in or register to see images
Equality
The average pre-tax personal income in Burnley is the third lowest in Lancashire at just £20,400 - £7,000 below the national average.
You must log in or register to see images
Healthy Living
The cancer mortality rate, the circulatory disease mortality rate and the infant mortality rate in Burnley are all above the national and regional and averages.
You must log in or register to see images
Housing and Homelessness
Burnley has the highest percentage of vacant homes in Lancashire at 7.4% (compared to 3.1% nationally).
You must log in or register to see images
Local Economy, including Social Enterprises
For every 100 newly registered businesses in Burnley, on average 10 close within their first year.
You must log in or register to see images
Safety
Burnley suffers from a high crime rate with figures in 2011/12 indicating there were 49.9 offences recorded per 1,000 people - compared to 36.3 in Lancashire and 38 in England & Wales.
You must log in or register to see images
Social Isolation
24% of residents over the age of 60 live below the poverty line in Burnley.
You must log in or register to see images
Strong Communities
18.5% of people in Burnley give some form of unpaid help at least once a month, the lowest rate in Lancashire.
You must log in or register to see images
Work
Burnley has one of the lowest self-employment rates in Lancashire, ranking in the lowest 15% nationally.
Exactly. Because it's always been the rich and powerful who have been in charge and made the decisions to suit themselves.
There has never been anything like a society built around fairness and equal opportunity (and probably never will be) no matter how often politicians bandy those words about.
Is the concept of social evolution beyond you? If you keep holding up the politics of the dark ages as normal and acceptable, then in the dark ages we'll remain.
The law of the jungle has applied throughout history, but if we ever want to free ourselves from it we have to look for better alternatives. If however, you take the "I'm alright, Jack so everything's good" attitude then things never will improve.
" Trickle down". Really?![]()
Apart from the obvious headlines (Tories getting an unexpected majority, SNP avalanche, Libdem demolition, bigwigs losing their seats), the striking feature for me is :
UKIP: 3m+ votes - 1 seat
SNP: 3m+ votes - 56 seats
I dislike UKIP, their members and their policies but my point is that the system is inherently unfair. How can the parties sitting the same election and the same parliament be so differently represented? Is it not time to look at our first past the post system?
Apart from the obvious headlines (Tories getting an unexpected majority, SNP avalanche, Libdem demolition, bigwigs losing their seats), the striking feature for me is :
UKIP: 3m+ votes - 1 seat
SNP: 3m+ votes - 56 seats
I dislike UKIP, their members and their policies but my point is that the system is inherently unfair. How can the parties sitting the same election and the same parliament be so differently represented? Is it not time to look at our first past the post system?
Apart from the obvious headlines (Tories getting an unexpected majority, SNP avalanche, Libdem demolition, bigwigs losing their seats), the striking feature for me is :
UKIP: 3m+ votes - 1 seat
SNP: 3m+ votes - 56 seats
I dislike UKIP, their members and their policies but my point is that the system is inherently unfair. How can the parties sitting the same election and the same parliament be so differently represented? Is it not time to look at our first past the post system?
Also UKIP got 4 million votes to SNPs 1.5 million, that's quite incredible really
Wrong. Labour has destroyed Burnley. Disappointingly they won the Burnley seat though. Pendle to the tories though. Good news for them.

Oh, believe me, they've been great for my employer and me and the other lowly workers have benefited from that.
