Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Sir_Red said:
I can accept that. Chelsea are light years ahead of us. As for United, they are not, they have flattered to deceive and had they finished outside the CL then they would be in financial troubles to the tune of £50million less revenue (Sponsorship due to be cut + no cl dosh). But as it is, we gifted them 4th with our ****e spending and piss poor performances, and as a result have heaped more pressure on ourselves.
Click to expand...

Our revenue increased 10% this year with no CL. It will increase substantially this year, with or without CL.

We will take over Real and Barcelona this year with it though.
 
UnitedinRed said:
Our revenue increased 10% this year with no CL. It will increase substantially this year, with or without CL.

We will take over Real and Barcelona this year with it though.
Click to expand...

Everyone's revenue has jumped due to the TV rights. and with the CL next year you get more tv money, greater gate receipts, and your full sponsorship amounts. You would find your spending spree your about to embark on considerably more difficult had you not got CL
 
Sir_Red said:
Everyone's revenue has jumped due to the TV rights. and with the CL next year you get more tv money, greater gate receipts, and your full sponsorship amounts. You would find your spending spree your about to embark on considerably more difficult had you not got CL
Click to expand...

The same must apply to you lot this summer then?
 
Sir_Red said:
Everyone's revenue has jumped due to the TV rights. and with the CL next year you get more tv money, greater gate receipts, and your full sponsorship amounts. You would find your spending spree your about to embark on considerably more difficult had you not got CL
Click to expand...

The tv deal hasnt kicked on yet. Its raised on our shirt deal and will increase again, before any tv money, next season due to the 75million from adidas.

We will break half a billion next season.
 
Tobes said:
The same must apply to you lot this summer then?
Click to expand...

We don't have a no CL clause with our sponsors, as far as I'm aware. But yea, we won't be spending big and even if we could it would all be in vane - like £25million on Delph or something
 
Sir_Red said:
We don't have a no CL clause with our sponsors, as far as I'm aware. But yea, we won't be spending big and even if we could it would all be in vane - like £25million on Delph or something
Click to expand...

Our adidas deal drops to over 50million without CL. Still the biggest around.

No CL would have hampered us a little. We would probanly only increase our revenue by another
10% rather than 20%
 
UnitedinRed said:
The tv deal hasnt kicked on yet. Its raised on our shirt deal and will increase again, before any tv money, next season due to the 75million from adidas.

We will break half a billion next season.
Click to expand...

and you'll hand it all out in wages and fees... its the diarrhoea league (spelling esp. for RHC)
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
doesn't say how barca and real are going to shrink to allow you to get to 1st.. which is your statement.

I sense a bit of jumping up and down and look at me syndrome here.
Click to expand...

They have no new tv deal, no new shirt deals and will make roughly the same as last season in CL revenue.
 
UnitedinRed said:
They have no new tv deal, no new shirt deals and will make roughly the same as last season in CL revenue.
Click to expand...

I sense you really want to sing "my clubs so great, my clubs so great.. we're better than you nanahnananha..."

all cos a 21 year old chose to sign for a manager he was always going to sign for which is a nice pretext but the boasting of revenues and how you are going to be no 1 in world and 205 growth in revenues gives it away just a little bit.
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
I sense you really want to sing "my clubs so great, my clubs so great.. we're better than you nanahnananha..."

all cos a 21 year old chose to sign for a manager he was always going to sign for which is a nice pretext but the boasting of revenues and how you are going to be no 1 in world and 205 growth in revenues gives it away just a little bit.
Click to expand...

It was in reply to Sir Reds claims. Stop talking bollocks MITO. <ok>
 
UnitedinRed said:
It was in reply to Sir Reds claims. Stop talking bollocks MITO. <ok>
Click to expand...

I'm only picking on you for a laugh...

I've told this lot this is all just pure frustration at team results cos they've no clue if we actually bid on him or not. when lacazette joins cheslea i am totally sure we will hear the same stuff.
 
UnitedinRed said:
461million as of now. Adidas deal is 50million above nike deal.

Without even taking the CL and new TV deal into account.
Click to expand...

Didnt realise you were a shareholder and would be taking a cut of the profit United make?

wait, you're not? So why are you so concerned about how much money it makes, I watch football for the enjoyment not to shout that my club earns more money than your club. Most clubs fleece the fans via shirts ticket prices etc so how much money they make is hardly something should be celebrating.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back