I'm still sat here wondering why we're only signing him today? What benefit is there in leaving it till the last minute? Alf was loaned out ages ago, surely that should have been the catalyst for this deal.
Same with the kids on loan from Everton and the Swindon Aussie. They've all been available with no obvious replacements requiring to be signed before they would be released. I do think the bid for the Aussie might have been one to appease the fans rather than sign the player. A sort of "look we tried to buy a £3.5m midfielder but nasty Swindon wouldn't let us" rather than a genuine attempt. I suppose the counter argument is that Tan actually would probably like to sign the Asian cup's MVP.
I think to answer my own question its - The club from the top to the bottom couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery, but it's still ridiculous.
More worryingly, maybe Slade has persuaded Tan it's the lack of quality not his total ineptitude that has resulted in our form. If Tan is backing his man (to a fashion) we might be stuck with the clueless prick for a little while yet.
Same with the kids on loan from Everton and the Swindon Aussie. They've all been available with no obvious replacements requiring to be signed before they would be released. I do think the bid for the Aussie might have been one to appease the fans rather than sign the player. A sort of "look we tried to buy a £3.5m midfielder but nasty Swindon wouldn't let us" rather than a genuine attempt. I suppose the counter argument is that Tan actually would probably like to sign the Asian cup's MVP.
I think to answer my own question its - The club from the top to the bottom couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery, but it's still ridiculous.
More worryingly, maybe Slade has persuaded Tan it's the lack of quality not his total ineptitude that has resulted in our form. If Tan is backing his man (to a fashion) we might be stuck with the clueless prick for a little while yet.


