Is that just so he can play vs City though?
Won't make a difference-hearing is tomorrow
Oops beaten to it
Is that just so he can play vs City though?
I think they can extend it if they think it's a frivolous appeal. But probably only a game. So, in short, just wishful thinking.Is that possible or just wishful thinking?
3 is the standard for violent conduct - which this definitely was. In the past they have added a game on for a frivolous appeal, and frankly this is surely that. The only doubt is whether he did it once or twice.they are saying 3 if he is found guilty
3 is the standard for violent conduct - which this definitely was. In the past they have added a game on for a frivolous appeal, and frankly this is surely that. The only doubt is whether he did it once or twice.
He has only been charged for one offence though, so, if he is found guilty it will be for 3 games plus one if it is deemed a frivolous appealSurely it should be 6 if he did it twice. That's how the law works right? You don't get away with a 2nd murder just because you're being punished for the first.
He has only been charged for one offence though, so, if he is found guilty it will be for 3 games plus one if it is deemed a frivolous appeal
I think they did decide, as he was airborne, he couldn't avoid the Skrtel contact. Wrong imo.I know that, but is there a reason he hasn't been charged for both? Did they declare the Skrtel one an accident? I thought the ref said he saw neither so surely both are fair game
I think they did decide, as he was airborne, he couldn't avoid the Skrtel contact. Wrong imo.
I know that, but is there a reason he hasn't been charged for both? Did they declare the Skrtel one an accident? I thought the ref said he saw neither so surely both are fair game
Why is anyone expecting the F.A. to be consistent except when it's consistently ignoring violent conduct against our players.
Excellent news. Is there any prospect of him returning to the board?I am pleased to inform those of you who have been concerned about Notso's absence from this board, that I have had a chat with him and he is alive and well. The contents of our chat shall remain private, but the most important thing is he is okay.
Could you tell him that the mods are happy to discuss any problem that he might have with the board next time you see him, please?I am pleased to inform those of you who have been concerned about Notso's absence from this board, that I have had a chat with him and he is alive and well. The contents of our chat shall remain private, but the most important thing is he is okay.
Could you tell him that the mods are happy to discuss any problem that he might have with the board next time you see him, please?
Shame to lose a popular regular if it can be avoided.
I suspect PNP is just saying IF he had a problem with any of the posters. I don't recall any big rows with Notso involved.I didn't realise that he had any problems with the board - or if he did, that they would prevent him posting.
If that's all it is, I'm sure he'll be back.

Please tell him that his contribution is sorely missed and I think most of our posters think that.I am pleased to inform those of you who have been concerned about Notso's absence from this board, that I have had a chat with him and he is alive and well. The contents of our chat shall remain private, but the most important thing is he is okay.