Arbitration?

[PLT]

Everyone's expecting February but there still hasn't been a date announced for the hearing. Is it being kept secret or have they really still not sorted a date out?

November was meant to be the latest it could be. What's the delay?

 

[Double_Dragon]

An allam meltdown when the FA say no again will come at the perfect time to rock the boat further and subsequently help drive the final nail into our PL coffin.

Keep your ****ing trap shut old man, yeah?

 

[TygerTyger]

An allam meltdown when the FA say no again will come at the perfect time to rock the boat further and subsequently help drive the final nail into our PL coffin.

Keep your ****ing trap shut old man, yeah?

And if the FA say yes? Will you drop it and keep your mouth shut?

 

[bum_chinned_crab]

And if the FA say yes? Will you drop it and keep your mouth shut?

Well no, he got to appeal their decision and if they change their mind it would be fair to appeal that decision.

 

[Kempton]

And if the FA say yes? Will you drop it and keep your mouth shut?

No.

 

[Double_Dragon]

And if the FA say yes? Will you drop it and keep your mouth shut?

The FA wont be saying yes. The silly old bastard will have to reapply and completely ruin another season with this utter drivel.

 

[tigers 2008]

As usual, the utter drivel is on here when this chewed to death bone of contention is periodically dragged up.

 

[TygerTyger]

The FA wont be saying yes. The silly old bastard will have to reapply and completely ruin another season with this utter drivel.

Avoiding the question.

Why should he drop it if you won't?

And therein lies the problem. Everything you accuse him of you are guilty of yourself. Intransigent, self opinionated, and a gobshite. Interesting, but I think most would rather concentrate on our "on pitch" problems at the moment, which makes me wonder why you raised this now.

 

[PLT]

Avoiding the question.

Why should he drop it if you won't?

And therein lies the problem. Everything you accuse him of you are guilty of yourself. Intransigent, self opinionated, and a gobshite. Interesting, but I think most would rather concentrate on our "on pitch" problems at the moment, which makes me wonder why you raised this now.

Because we aren't wrong.

 

[highpeak tiger]

Intransigent, self opinionated, and a gobshite.

I share your opinion of our owner

 

[Happy Tiger]

YAY! Another one of these threads! I've missed them!

No, of course he's not allowed to appeal, only the antis are allowed to do that. Of course he's not right, only the antis are right. Etc etc

 

[renegadetiger]

Why should he drop it if you won't?

Because he said that the name change application was "only once"?

You're not surely suggesting he isn't a man of his word?

 

[PLT]

Of course he's not right, only the antis are right. Etc etc

Well yeah. If your whole argument is "No one questions me." Then you can't expect people to pay much respect to it.

 

[TygerTyger]

Ah yes, the sweet reek of hypocrisy.

 

[Happy Tiger]

Well yeah. If you're whole argument is "No one questions me." Then you can't expect people to pay much respect to it.

Well obviously we can't argue with you, because you're never wrong are you?

 

[PLT]

Well obviously we can't argue with you, because you're never wrong are you?

Wonderfully convincing argument as always.

 

[Happy Tiger]

Wonderfully convincing argument as always.

If you say so, I wouldn't presume to question you. You're always right.

 

[TygerTyger]

Well obviously we can't argue with you, because you're never wrong are you?

I think you are beginning to get the idea. Rule 1. No views may oppose the CTWD views.

 

[Happy Tiger]

I think you are beginning to get the idea. Rule 1. No views may oppose the CTWD views.

Wow, that is indeed news to me. Thanks for the heads up.

 

[Tonight We Dine In Hull]

I think you are beginning to get the idea. Rule 1. No views may oppose the CTWD views.

You have every right to oppose but offer something other than whining at the fact you 'aren't allowed to'.