In the light of the above arguments we should define what we mean by "worst".
He can correct me if I'm wrong, but I imagine Astro meant "least deserving"- meaning the one for whom success was largely due to factors other than his intrinsic management skills. Under those circumstances, the character traits of the man are mostly irrelevant, as only behaviour having a direct bearing on his winning the PL matter.
This being the case, Dalglish's dealings with personality issues don't matter (especially as they occurred in his second stint at Liverpool, when the crucial factor of winning the PL doesn't enter into it).
At Blackburn he showed that he could do well with enough money in comparison to that available to others- this is neither more nor less than the ability shown by successive managers of Chelsea or City more recently. However, by the time he came back to us, the world of football management had largely left him behind.

Yep. I meant his second stint. He really shouldn't have returned.

