The IncREDibles:7338631 said:My theory is that our defence would not be much better even if we had Chelsea's back four playing for us, mainly because Mignolet is the biggest problem, as is Rodgers' insistence on him being a sweeper keeper, which he plainly is not.
Migs is part of the problem but he's not the biggest part.
Gerrard (the doorman) and the 3 clowns i.e. Skrtel, Lovren and Johnson are the problem. All 4 are mediocre at what they do.
Soft, soft, goal conceded against Bournemouth...whose's fault?.
I put it down to three things mainly.
1 - Protection from midfield
2 - Mignolet and his lack of command
3 - Lack of balance (our CB's dont look like a balance pairing like Terry and Cahill or Ramos and Varane).
Exactly - it's the whole unit that needs looking at. Funny thing is, we have Manquillo, Moreno, Toure and Sakho who can form a very good defence. Then we play Lucas or Can ahead of them.
It's not perfect but it provides us with a better platform to defend - and these are players we already own. Rodgers is hell bent on playing Johnson, Skrtel and Lovren.
Johnson and now Lovren is potentially injured - can't stop smiling.

You knew it was coming so here you go...![]()

Yes they did... All they needed do was play it down our left side and they cut us up.... That is totally true, undeniable
The formation with a 343 led directly to it as markovic as an lev with lovern there was ridiculous
Also Lucas tracked runs but Gerrard ball watched all night but got the plaudits from pulls as having ran the game!
I'm betting there is no way this set up goes forward to arsenal game
I wouldn't be so sure.
He'll feel like he's hit a winning formula and I'd be surprised if he changed it for Sunday.

I wouldn't be so sure.
He'll feel like he's hit a winning formula and I'd be surprised if he changed it for Sunday.
Thing is, I've seen a few on here say we can't defend so we may as well go all out attack instead. If that's the case, we can't then start moaning that we're not defensive enough![]()