The one on ones that both Le Fondre and Macheda missed Saturday.
Would you have backed Joe Mason to have slotted at least one of them?
Would you have backed Joe Mason to have slotted at least one of them?

Steve
You are discounting all the other good work ALF does, closing down players, running the channels, creating space for others - which no other bu££er uses.
Quite simply we don't create enough chances. Create opportunities in the box and ALF will score. At least both he and Macheda forced good saves from their keeper.
I'm not convinced Noone is fully fit. Only one good run Saturday, beat his full back and put in a terrific cross from which we should have scored at the back post. I know he was covering back a lot but that was his only real run.
We continue to get over run in the middle of the park. For 35 minutes we were on top but their 4 in the middle with Shinnie playing between striker and midfield out numbered us and Whitts and Gunnar were eventually pushed back. Gunnar was terrific but he was out on his feet for the last 20.
I'm still very much of the opinion that we need another combative midfield player at least as it all falls on Gunnar at present. We need to win the ball and hold it. We must have had 60% possession first half but over the whole game it reverted to 51/49 in their favour. After about 40 minutes each game (apart from Leeds) it feels like the opposition have a man more than us.
KWJ is not the answer. We will revert to lumping the ball up in the air and giving it away more often than not. Maynard did nothing when he came on and is Guerra still with us?
Joe is a good player but as pointed out can't make the Bolton 11 at the moment. I'm not sure he is any better than what we have.
No, I'm not discounting his other work. The rest of his game has been good/very good.
It's what has kept him in the side until now because his 'finishing' has been embarrassing since he arrived. I said to Sparks on another thread that a striker who doesn't score is a major problem unless the rest of the side keeps covering his misses. I stand by that. It's like having a goalie that makes 1 big mistake a game but is otherwise excellent.
I know Maynard has been poor off the bench but it is time for someone else to have a go. Until he is given at least a 3-5 game run it is unfair to judge him. I'd like to see Macheda retained with him as I think he's a better all round player than KWJ.
I think Daehli and Ravel are both injured Hilts, but away from home in particular I'd like to see a 4-4-1-1 rather than the orthodox 4-4-2 we've been using.


That's it, I'm off, no one agrees with me.
Sod the lot of you!!!!
Hold on, I'm top of the Prediction League - again. So perhaps I'll stay - if you ask me nicely.![]()
Of the two (Macheda/Le Fondre), I'd stick with Le Fondre every time if we're going to continue with a 4-4-2. He WILL score - the only question is whether Slade is prepared to try something different away from home.

I still think Slade is missing a trick with Kimbo, I know he's light weight but he's quality at this level.
That's it, I'm off, no one agrees with me.
Sod the lot of you!!!!
Hold on, I'm top of the Prediction League - again. So perhaps I'll stay - if you ask me nicely.![]()

Same could be said for Daehli. A manager needs to have belief in his methods, but Slade's belief is in danger of being classed alongside tunnel vision.
Ole chopped and changed when it didn't work - Slade is keeping it broadly the same when it clearly isn't working, and that can be just as bad.
I'm all for "continuity, strength and character" in the side, but there comes a time when introducing a bit of flair like Ravel, Daehli and yes, I agree even Kimbo, could just do the trick.

Players that stand up all the time are over rated anyway![]()
