The Rodgers Out Thread (well sort of)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
luvgonzo said:
There was a thread for that. :D

He's a good manager who needs the right support and the right advice at this point in his career, I hope the right people are there to do just that.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you should have a word with him, sure you'd fill him with confidence <ok>
 
Lucaaas said:
Your inability to read and comprehend people's posts always manages to surprise me.

Mong.
Click to expand...

Your inability to stand by the utter crap you post, never surprises me either.

You said "I think some of the problems have to be blamed on the owners"

Which is total and utter s**te, as all they've done is back him with both fees and wages, it's him who made the decisions and him who's spunked the cash on crap. You attempting to shift even some of that blame onto the men who wrote the cheques is beyond idiotic, even by your low standards

P.s. Spastic and mong? Classy as ever from you <applause>
 
Tobes said:
Your inability to stand by the utter crap you post, never surprises me either.

You said "I think some of the problems have to be blamed on the owners"

Which is total and utter s**te, as all they've done is back him with both fees and wages, it's him who made the decisions and him who's spunked the cash on crap. You attempting to shift even some of that blame onto the men who wrote the cheques is beyond idiotic, even by your low standards

P.s. Spastic and mong? Classy as ever from you <applause>
Click to expand...

I have to step in here, is it BR's decision to not sign the best ready made player? Of course not. We were interested in Falcao for instance but baulked at all the fees + his wages


FOr you to suggest that a manager doesnt want the best players he can possibly get is pointing the idiotic arrow to yourself. A manager wants the best proven low risk players for every single position on the pitch

More chance of him winning games + therefore boosting his own career

Our owners have a way of operating, im not bashing it and will always be grateful to our owners for saving us. Im afraid you look the idiotic one here though to suggest they just give him the player he wants
 
Tobes said:
Your inability to stand by the utter crap you post, never surprises me either.

You said "I think some of the problems have to be blamed on the owners"

Which is total and utter s**te, as all they've done is back him with both fees and wages, it's him who made the decisions and him who's spunked the cash on crap. You attempting to shift even some of that blame onto the men who wrote the cheques is beyond idiotic, even by your low standards

P.s. Spastic and mong? Classy as ever from you <applause>
Click to expand...

So does anyone on this forum, apart from Tobes, think that "I think some of the problems have to be blamed on the owners" translates to blaming the owners for Rodgers spunking £230m (in Tobes' words, not facts).
 
Lucaaas said:
So does anyone on this forum, apart from Tobes, think that "I think some of the problems have to be blamed on the owners" translates to blaming the owners for Rodgers spunking £230m (in Tobes' words, not facts).
Click to expand...

Nope although this forum does seem to have gone mad after today's result for some reason. #embarrassing
 
The DR says said:
I have to step in here, is it BR's decision to not sign the best ready made player? Of course not. We were interested in Falcao for instance but baulked at all the fees + his wages


FOr you to suggest that a manager doesnt want the best players he can possibly get is pointing the idiotic arrow to yourself. A manager wants the best proven low risk players for every single position on the pitch

More chance of him winning games + therefore boosting his own career

Our owners have a way of operating, im not bashing it and will always be grateful to our owners for saving us. Im afraid you look the idiotic one here though to suggest they just give him the player he wants
Click to expand...

What's Falcao got to do with the actual point we were talking about? Oh yeah, that'll be f** all <doh>

Soft Ollie's assertion that the owners are partly culpable for the failure of Rodgers signings is absolute bollocks, that's all that I was saying
 
Lucaaas said:
So does anyone on this forum, apart from Tobes, think that "I think some of the problems have to be blamed on the owners" translates to blaming the owners for Rodgers spunking £230m (in Tobes' words, not facts).
Click to expand...


The context was in relation to his transfer business, so don't try and twist it you gimp
 
Tobes said:
What's Falcao got to do with the actual point we were talking about? Oh yeah, that'll be f** all <doh>

Soft Ollie's assertion that the owners are partly culpable for the failure of Rodgers signings is absolute bollocks, that's all that I was saying
Click to expand...

Fair enough but what im saying is every manager wants the players with the best track record. BR wanted Falcao, a good striker, but we backed off, why? It isnt BR's money is it.

We dont work that way, we sign potential. So my point was for you to say he's been backed to fees and wages to what he wanted I dont think he has, because a manger would always choose to sign a proven player than one with potential, for the majority of the time

He has been backed though and of course BR has made some signings, like I said to you on the Manc board, he will live or die by his decisions, like all managers


He has been backed but none of us will know if he got the players he wanted, given our strategy I would say not as ask any manager, They would always sign proven talent
 
Treble said:
It's the "Escape from New York" equivalent of a football forum mate. Complete inbreds most of them.
Click to expand...



Do you use that site? The Manc board is very busy there compared to on here. I wonder what your user names are on there
 
Treble said:
It's the "Escape from New York" equivalent of a football forum mate. Complete inbreds most of them.
Click to expand...

Most of the kopites are absolute flutes over there. Most of them are in that thread
 
The DR says said:
Fair enough but what im saying is every manager wants the players with the best track record. BR wanted Falcao, a good striker, but we backed off, why? It isnt BR's money is it.

We dont work that way, we sign potential. So my point was for you to say he's been backed to fees and wages to what he wanted I dont think he has, because a manger would always choose to sign a proven player than one with potential, for the majority of the time

He has been backed though and of course BR has made some signings, like I said to you on the Manc board, he will live or die by his decisions, like all managers


He has been backed but none of us will know if he got the players he wanted, given our strategy I would say not as ask any manager, They would always sign proven talent
Click to expand...

Your assertion isn't backed up by the simple facts though.

You're making out that he's being forced to buy potential and work with kids. He's bought Lallana - 26, Lambert - 32, Lovren - 25, Sakho - 24 and Mad Mario - 24 of late. These aren't 'potential' they're experienced players ffs, you're just making bollocks excuses for his transfer f** ups
 
The DR says said:
Do you use that site? The Manc board is very busy there compared to on here. I wonder what your user names are on there
Click to expand...

<laugh> I only had one and it's the same as here. I haven't been on in years. As I said, the whole site is a cesspit of ignorant wums. I did enjoy winding up the spud fans on there so I guess I'm being a bit of a hypocrit, but it got boring if you wanted some intelligent debate.

As for the manc board on here, quality not quantity <whistle>
 
Tobes said:
You're assertion isn't backed up by the simple facts though.

You're making out that he's being forced to buy potential and work with kids. He's bought Lallana - 26, Lambert - 32, Lovren - 25, Sakho - 24 and Mad Mario - 24 of late. These aren't 'potential' they're experienced players ffs, you're just making bollocks excuses for his transfer f** ups
Click to expand...

Lallana, Lambert, Lovren and Sakho have been superb signings though 'allmariosfault
 
Gerrez said:
Lallana, Lambert, Lovren and Sakho have been superb signings though 'allmariosfault
Click to expand...

Lallana is a cut above the other 3, and I wouldn't even class him as superb just yet. Not until those 4 players look like they belong at Liverpool, not Spurs, could you class any as superb tbh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back