SuperMod notice
- Thread starter Rollercoaster Ranger
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Sorry Beth and Roller.
That Friday feeling has got the better of me. I will shut up now!
Yep, I wanna see a nice Stinking Bishop please...
I never knew that variety even existed!
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
This selection will make Wubba, and Ben Gunn, drool (me too, just before lunch here on a Friday):-
You must log in or register to see images
I love your Opus Dei self flagellation moments. That Catholicism, damn hard to kick........
Talking of bans. did we all just get through an international break with out some one getting kicked off?
I have amended the forum rules as posted at the bottom of my sig to reflect these changes. The relevant section now reads as follows.........
2a. Definitions of Acceptable Content
Moderate Images
Images enhance the quality of and general interest in content. However images must be moderate and fit for public consumption.
Images depicting the body (e.g. ‘pin-ups’
whilst considered non-sexist in our February 2013 review, must not be posted. This means that any picture displaying nipple(s) will be removed and the poster attempting to do so will be banned from this site. This was decided by the Supermods and Site owner in October 2014 and worded thus...
• All nudity is to be removed from the publicly available boards with immediate effect. Yes including nipples.
2a. Definitions of Acceptable Content
Moderate Images
Images enhance the quality of and general interest in content. However images must be moderate and fit for public consumption.
Images depicting the body (e.g. ‘pin-ups’
whilst considered non-sexist in our February 2013 review, must not be posted. This means that any picture displaying nipple(s) will be removed and the poster attempting to do so will be banned from this site. This was decided by the Supermods and Site owner in October 2014 and worded thus...• All nudity is to be removed from the publicly available boards with immediate effect. Yes including nipples.
As far as I'm aware I don't post any pics that contain exposed nipples. They maybe somewhat saucy granted, but no where near top shelf kinda stuff. I thought they added a light hearted take to my MD threads. Maybe they will have to go. I'll look into it.
I wouldn't worry about it. It takes a hell of a lot more than what you posted to offend me. I don't see why your imposing a ban on yourself? If you've not been banned by a Mod or those from above, then I'd just crack on mate.
Come on Mr 9's, you should know me well enough by now to know I'm just doing what I do best being an idiot,lol.
Again, I'm sorry for acting the clown and turning this into a cheese thread.
Keep the pics coming Nines.......here's some food for thought.
So under the new rules perhaps a picture like would now be one of those borderline grey areas?
You must log in or register to see images
Carmen Electra to play Katie Price in new movie?
...and perhaps this a little more borderline?
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
Oh, to be a cellphone. Everyoneâs favourite Paraguayan soccer babe from the World Cup posed for the South American Playboy.
Actually a classic picture like this almost leaves more to the imagination:-
You must log in or register to see images
Singer and sweater girl Patti Page wearing a bullet bra in 1955
I really do not understand what would motivate a sane person into this type of self imposed behaviour.
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
Bloodied: An Afghan Shi'ite Muslim flagellates himself during an Ashura procession in Kabul
Slashing themselves with chained blades, bloodied Shi’ite Muslims including young boys flagellate themselves to mark the death of the Prophet’s grandson
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cluding-young-boys-flagellate-themselves.html
999s Does this ban on nipples extend to boys nipples???? For example Adel scores a hat trick tomorrow and takes off his shirt....exposing his nipples.....
This would be an image that we would all like to have on every single post....the hat trick celebration not the nipples of course.....
Is that a ban....or is this only girlie nipples.???
Just asking....because (more seriously) I really have never understood this at all....And I am not talking about porn at all.....why am I allowed to look at (top) half naked boys....and you are not allowed to look at (top) half naked girls.
Nearly all of us (ok maybe not all) know what non offensive stuff is...I have never been offended, on most parts not really noticed, 999s pin ups.
Most people are not delicate flowers that need "protecting"
This would be an image that we would all like to have on every single post....the hat trick celebration not the nipples of course.....
Is that a ban....or is this only girlie nipples.???
Just asking....because (more seriously) I really have never understood this at all....And I am not talking about porn at all.....why am I allowed to look at (top) half naked boys....and you are not allowed to look at (top) half naked girls.
Nearly all of us (ok maybe not all) know what non offensive stuff is...I have never been offended, on most parts not really noticed, 999s pin ups.
Most people are not delicate flowers that need "protecting"
MY GIRLS NIPPLES ARE OUT
like cigars apparently
but she has her back to us so that's ok
It's all to do with the site owners wanting to keep the site open Beth. They have been getting banned by Google, thus losing advertising income.
I think it would be safest to say no nipples whatsoever, otherwise some clown will call it sexist, and probably safest to include the areola in the definition of nipple.
Just to re-iterate, these are the site owners rules and in place to ensure that he keeps his google ranking and advertising income, without which there will be no Not606 forum.
As for Kilburn's examples of potential grey areas, it is very hard to judge. It is worth remembering that this is all judged by some clever algorithm that google have on their servers, not some bloke pouring through pages of internet posts looking for nipples.
It is not as if these pictures are hard to find elsewhere on the internet so if in doubt, please don't post it.
Just to re-iterate, these are the site owners rules and in place to ensure that he keeps his google ranking and advertising income, without which there will be no Not606 forum.
As for Kilburn's examples of potential grey areas, it is very hard to judge. It is worth remembering that this is all judged by some clever algorithm that google have on their servers, not some bloke pouring through pages of internet posts looking for nipples.
It is not as if these pictures are hard to find elsewhere on the internet so if in doubt, please don't post it.
So this picture of one of my favourite players (well he was for about 4 matches) Stephen Mbia is not allowed
You must log in or register to see images