Revamped Soppiest Bollocks Rules

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
The other times more recently when I awarded it rather than the winning nominator was when brb cheated for about 5/6 months running as well as Norman earlier this year for cheating. <ok>

Consider it explained Matt and put to bed, that's my last comment on the subject now I've cleared it up. <ok>

Fofucksake.
Twenty four hours have gone by and instead of either posting edited extracts or confessing to making it up Stephanie has decided to runaway again. We won't forget steve, there are many questions to answer.
 
The clue was when I said 'that's my last comment on the matter'! <doh>

Fofucksake.
Twenty four hours have gone by and instead of either posting edited extracts or confessing to making it up Stephanie has decided to runaway again. We won't forget steve, there are many questions to answer.

Dear Steven,

Many thanks for your letter, dated 6th October last. Your comments have been duly noted.

You make several references to the fact that you have always awarded the trophy in the event of a tie.

According to your above statement, up until the disputed incident in question, you have only EVER delivered the coveted award once!

I ask you to clarify the above statement, as well as your last statement calling Glory a cheat.

Kind Regards

Ellandback

The seeker of truth and justice

I deny ever cheating at worst I misunderstood the rules.

After 20 hours of trawling through all the months of SBA you came up with one example of how you presented the award in the event of a tie. For the sake of completeness how many times didn't you present the award in these circumstances. I am aware of at least 5, I suspect Elland has a similar recollection to me.

Given how you are fighting for the very survival of the SBA and this board as a whole I was expecting so much more than a tissue of deceit, half truths and boat loads of inaccuracy.

Elland I notice ur in here reading Steves s**te, what do you think?
Am I the only one that thinks the fecker is making it up as he goes along?

I thank my learned friend for his comments, and wish to apply the following :-

i) Provide evidence of Glory cheating

ii) Reply to allegation of corruption, half truths and weak arguments.

iii) Admittion you deserve a nomination for the SBA.

As discussed previously you can always take a sickie...
You are right you don't have to edit anything, but you are going to have to if you want to try and rebut the central charge against you.
 
The clue was when I said 'that's my last comment on the matter'! <doh>

No fishing trip was undertaken, a bloody good job too given that all that kept biting was a tiddler that no self respecting wum would consider worth the effort.
I consider your lack of a response proof enough that you were making it up as you went along.
Get yourself nominated for giving out third rate bulls**t.
 
No fishing trip was undertaken, a bloody good job too given that all that kept biting was a tiddler that no self respecting wum would consider worth the effort.
I consider your lack of a response proof enough that you were making it up as you went along.
Get yourself nominated for giving out third rate bulls**t.

More to the point Norman, I'm bored going over the same old ground! <doh>

Matt is like a pmt rottweiler with a bone and you've had your **** stirring stick out long enough now! <laugh>
 
More to the point Norman, I'm bored going over the same old ground! <doh>

Matt is like a pmt rottweiler with a bone and you've had your **** stirring stick out long enough now! <laugh>

My erstwhile colleague is only being so diligent and fastidious in his fight against the wrongs you have perpetrated because he cares about right from wrong, you do us a disservice by lashing out at us while we are standing up for truth and justice. Think of us as upholders of decent values.
 
My erstwhile colleague is only being so diligent and fastidious in his fight against the wrongs you have perpetrated because he cares about right from wrong, you do us a disservice by lashing out at us while we are standing up for truth and justice. Think of us as upholders of decent values.

Decent values, do me a favour Norman but keep telling yourself that long enough and you'll end up believing it! <doh> <laugh>
 
In which case we continue.

Can't leave it Steve as you're wrong on this one!!!

If you're so confident yopu're right, put it to the vote.


Otherwise we may put it to the vote

Keep on wasting your life on a hopeless cause mate - your choice! <ok> <doh>

Only 'may' if you're so confident so speaks volumes? <doh>
 
'May' keeps our options open.

You trying to change the subject will not detour us from our mission

Mission. <doh>

I've done **** all wrong Matt other than in your mind so put it to the vote on our board if you're 'so' confident? <doh>

I don't think you are though given that Norman agreed with me and said that you're pmt initially and yet suddenly you're both pals again after all that he's said about you being Scumchester, it's your choice though Matt. <ok>
 
Mission. <doh>

I've done f** all wrong Matt other than in your mind so put it to the vote on our board if you're 'so' confident? <doh>

I don't think you are though given that Norman agreed with me and said that you're pmt initially and yet suddenly you're both pals again after all that he's said about you being Scumchester, it's your choice though Matt. <ok>

I meant Pathetic MillwallSteve Treatment. Did you mean something else?
 
Mission.

I've done f** all wrong Matt other than in your mind so put it to the vote on our board if you're 'so' confident?

I don't think you are though given that Norman agreed with me and said that you're pmt initially and yet suddenly you're both pals again after all that he's said about you being Scumchester, it's your choice though Matt.

Steve, I think that the pmt accusation applies to Norman as well.........

and as you are a gentleman, I am sure you will understand that a lady (or ladyboy) is allowed to change their mind and to keep nagging away like a dog with a bone...

it is what they do
 
Decent values, do me a favour Norman but keep telling yourself that long enough and you'll end up believing it! <doh> <laugh>

It has never been in doubt mate.
The only way you would recognise honesty and integrity would be by looking it up in a dictionary.
Slowly and quietly the wallies are preparing to overthrow you if you don't repent thy sins.
Only EIO is a follower now and even he is posting more on our board than your now.
 
Steve, I think that the pmt accusation applies to Norman as well.........

and as you are a gentleman, I am sure you will understand that a lady (or ladyboy) is allowed to change their mind and to keep nagging away like a dog with a bone...

it is what they do

and then there was only one left!
 
It has never been in doubt mate.
The only way you would recognise honesty and integrity would be by looking it up in a dictionary.
Slowly and quietly the wallies are preparing to overthrow you if you don't repent thy sins.
Only EIO is a follower now and even he is posting more on our board than your now.

<applause> <applause> <applause>

That Glory, he talks a lot of sense!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.