Revamped Soppiest Bollocks Rules

Ffs Norman, I wasn't going to pile through month's worth last night just because you both wanted me too as I had to get up silly early for work today.

I'll find them all right and I don't have to edit **** all as you'll see.

 

If you say so Matt.

 

****ing right and all EIO.

 

Matt/Norman,

I awarded last month's trophy as it was a draw as I reserve the right too in the rules.

http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/279323-Soppiest-Bollocks-September-Winner

http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/278858-Soppiest-Bollocks-September-Vote

August 2013 to egghead McDermott for the first ever tie.

http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/227356-Soppiest-bollocks-August-winner

http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/226836-Soppiest-bollocks-August-vote

There you go and as I said I've always awarded the trophy when there's a tie but there's only ever been two ties after going through all the vote results. I expect your immediate apologies without fail as I've proved my point.

The other times more recently when I awarded it rather than the winning nominator was when brb cheated for about 5/6 months running as well as Norman earlier this year for cheating.

 

The other times more recently when I awarded it rather than the winning nominator was when brb cheated for about 5/6 months running as well as Norman earlier this year for cheating.

Consider it explained Matt and put to bed, that's my last comment on the subject now I've cleared it up.

 

Dear Steven,

Many thanks for your letter, dated 6th October last. Your comments have been duly noted.

You make several references to the fact that you have always awarded the trophy in the event of a tie.

According to your above statement, up until the disputed incident in question, you have only EVER delivered the coveted award once!

I ask you to clarify the above statement, as well as your last statement calling Glory a cheat.

Kind Regards

Ellandback

The seeker of truth and justice

 

I deny ever cheating at worst I misunderstood the rules.

After 20 hours of trawling through all the months of SBA you came up with one example of how you presented the award in the event of a tie. For the sake of completeness how many times didn't you present the award in these circumstances. I am aware of at least 5, I suspect Elland has a similar recollection to me.

Given how you are fighting for the very survival of the SBA and this board as a whole I was expecting so much more than a tissue of deceit, half truths and boat loads of inaccuracy.

 

Elland I notice ur in here reading Steves s**te, what do you think?
Am I the only one that thinks the fecker is making it up as he goes along?

 

I thank my learned friend for his comments, and wish to apply the following :-

i) Provide evidence of Glory cheating

ii) Reply to allegation of corruption, half truths and weak arguments.

iii) Admittion you deserve a nomination for the SBA.

 

Proof would be something more than further innuendo and hearsay.
I never mentioned corruption, that's my next post.
Given the lack of any meaningful evidence that supports his main claim about presenting the prize there is no choice but to nominate himself for this months award, to do otherwise would bring great discredit on the Wallie family, Walton on Thames, South East trains and cockernees in general.

 

Ignorance of the law is not an excuse....

Neither is plain and simple IGNORANCE


Both yourself and Elland have impugned the word of our Most Revered Leader Kim, and have yet to show any worthwhile evidence that would stand up in a North Korean Court of Law, consequently the Great Leader has invited you to attend the Supreme Court in Pyongyang, where Kim will be sitting in judgement of your scurrilous accusations.

You will of course be given a fair hearing and thereafter be sentenced to be banished to the Scum board.

You may however reflect on what you have written and of course retract your allegations.

 

Think we'd get a fairer hearing in South Korea

 

Lift up thine eyes, cast off the shackles of bondage so cruelly forced upon you by the despot.
The time has come, rise up, rise up wallies
Overthrow the false prophet.
Divine providence ( and a couple of leeds fans) have given you the chance to save this forum before it is turned to ashes.

 

As discussed previously you can always take a sickie...
You are right you don't have to edit anything, but you are going to have to if you want to try and rebut the central charge against you.

 

that may well be the case.....

but fairness is not the issue...it is simply about retribution

 

I am happy to sit at the feet of our leader and be fed scraps of swiss cheese

 

There are none so desperate as those who cannot lead.

 

is that a quote from Strictly Come Dancing ?

 

I wouldn't know, is it?