Revamped Soppiest Bollocks Rules

Here we go then guys with the revamped rules.

(1) The winning nominator will have to award the trophy to the winner by starting a new thread, in the event of the eventual winner receiving multiple nominations (for the same reason) then the first winning nominator of the eventual winner will have to do the honours.

(2) Failure to do a funny or jovial new thread trophy presentation to the winner will result in an automatic nomination by default for the winning nominator the next month. Likewise, failure to present the trophy to the winner within 10 days after the vote will also result in an automatic nomination the following month for the winning nominator unless it's unavoidable for a fair enough reason.

(3) The previous monthly winner is up for nomination the following month by default as before.

(4) In the event of a tie the defending champion will automatically retain the trophy by default as before, in that case I'll award the trophy.

I'll cut the month short to get the winner decided by the end of the month so it doesn't overlap into the next month, so worst case scenario if someone does/says something that you think is soppiest bollocks worthy after the vote is up then you'll have to nominate them the following month so no biggie.

Of course I'll still be running the nomination thread with my usual complete and utter fairness that you'd expect of a ruling dictator!

 

I've dropped three rules but it seems not everyone has noticed!

 

Dropped three rules, and amended another to save yourself from an award.

 

How many more times Matt!

I amended rule 4 for clarity given your pmt mood as neither you or anyone else at any time before has ever questioned me awarding the trophy after a tied vote.

Suddenly now though it's an issue!

 

We were being polite and not pointing out how you ****ed up.

 

Bollocks Norman, of course you were!

 

Come on then, come up with a more plausible reason.

Ps no reply from mighty.
Think she has caught him uploading pron and closed his isp account.

 

As I've said before mate, nobody has ever questioned it so enough said.

Maybe he's busy with the new bigger art studio after the move as it's not like him not to be around in some form.

 

1. Not plausible, you know us better than that.
2. Hope ur right.

 

please log in to view this image

 

I note from previous posts that you say that every time there's a tie you always (multiple) deliver the award yourself.

You won't mind finding AT LEAST two times that you have done that then, won't you?

 

Steve, I note with interest when flicking through February's Soppy bollox award

http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/251835-Soppiest-Bollocks-February-Vote/page2

brb was the winning nominator by 1000 votes (for Minxy), but AGAIN, it was you that presented the award...

http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/252537-Soppiest-bollocks-February-winner

please log in to view this image

Soppiest bollocks February winner

Surprise, surprise the cheating pikey keeps the trophy for another month but this will be the last time he does due to my latest rule change!

Next month they'll deffo be a new winner no matter what so make the most of it Roy as your time as champion is coming to an end! ​

Last edited by Millwallsteve; 02/03/2014 at 07:42 PM.


Please explain!​

 

And no Minxy did not retain the award, as Glory won it in January, and nobody did a presentation?

Explain

 

Nothing to explain, the dopey ****er never arranged for me to be given the award, so I never got it. The irony wasn't lost on me, the model train enthusiast jumped several hoops to get me in the vote and then never ensured he followed through by giving the award to the person who didn't present it.

But you are right this thing about him presenting the award to the previous winner in the event of a tie is bollocks there are a number of occasions where he ain't done it. In fact he ain't done it more often than he has.

Perhaps the senile twat could prove me wrong by giving examples I must have missed since the SBA first appeared here.

 

That's it. He's totally in....

 

The SBA rather underplays his fecking stupidity. Can't believe he has made this claim about presenting the award in the event of a tie when we can all see its bollocks. Strikes me he thinks he really is Kim.

In fact it's just Napoleon complex(little man).

Not a hope in hell of him proving us wrong, there is nowhere near anything that backs up his claim to always do it.

 

He'll just edit the posts.

 

Will go through the old threads but not tonight as I'm up at 4am tomorrow on earlies, to prove you ****ers wrong once and for all ffs!

God this is ****ing tedious now.

 

Bullshit. If they existed you could find them in two minutes. Matt is right you are going to edit some responses.

 

Yet again, Glory is spot on.

Steve, we are watching you