Scotch Independence - the countdown

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should Scotland be an Independent Country?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
<doh>

Leave it for at least two more SP terms then have a new vote - it be a guaranteed Yes! I hope to **** we're not going to go through this every few years!

World Cup Championships, European Championships, Independence Referendum. Let's face it, we're never gonny be at the first two, so a wee indy ref every 4-6 years gies us an interest. :grin:
 
I just remembered something, if Scotland really had all that Oil to become rich on its own, then there is no way we would have been allowed to just walk away with it, what do you think this is?

The money tells you it was a done deal, even when Salmond was convinced they were winning, the momentum was all yes, the polls saying tightest it had ever been, Yes was down to 7/4. Nothing major happened that I could see yet No was smahed into 1/6, Yes was back out to 9/2. Somebody KNEW, simple as that.

Im starting to look at things now and at least in Glasgow, its seems absurd that the vote was that tight, it should have been a resounding YES in Glasgow, not a couple of points, its literally at least 3-1 in favour of Yes, and twitter backs this up, look at this site as well, loads of Glasgow on here, PUD and Treve against about 50.

Your vote was irrelevant, YES and NO, there is no such thing as democracy on matters of big money.

Yer right, eddie. The glaring fact that gives it away is Trev and Pud on the same side.

Note: pud has long been accused of being a closet Hun but I never believed it. Till now.
 
I just remembered something, if Scotland really had all that Oil to become rich on its own, then there is no way we would have been allowed to just walk away with it, what do you think this is?

The money tells you it was a done deal, even when Salmond was convinced they were winning, the momentum was all yes, the polls saying tightest it had ever been, Yes was down to 7/4. Nothing major happened that I could see yet No was smahed into 1/6, Yes was back out to 9/2. Somebody KNEW, simple as that.

Im starting to look at things now and at least in Glasgow, its seems absurd that the vote was that tight, it should have been a resounding YES in Glasgow, not a couple of points, its literally at least 3-1 in favour of Yes, and twitter and facebook backs this up, look at this site as well, loads of Glasgow on here, PUD and Treve against about 50.

Your vote was irrelevant, YES and NO, there is no such thing as democracy on matters of big money.

It is mainly YES voters that use Twitter and facebook, us NO voters are classier than that.
 
Put a yes voter into a field of no voters and watch the no voters scatter like sheep in presence of a Scottish Lion!




























































<laugh>